Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Elastography Methodology for the Evaluation of Tissue Engineered Construct Growth
Published on: February 9, 2012
Dependence of Magnetic Resonance Elastography-Derived Stiffness Values on Selected Imaging Parameters
Łukasz Hańczyk1, Marzanna Obrzut2, Marian Cholewa3
1Department of Radiology, Independent Public Health Care Center of the Ministry of Interior and Administration in Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
Purpose:
To evaluate the influence of driver power and slice thickness on magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-derived liver stiffness in human subjects and a tissue-mimicking phantom.
Methods:
A prospective single-center observational study was performed involving 34 adult participants (20 males; median age: 29.0 ± 29.3 years) and a standard phantom. MRE was conducted on a 1.5T scanner using a 2D gradient-recalled echo-based sequence. Human data were acquired at driver powers of 25%-100% and slice thicknesses of 5 and 10 mm. The phantom was scanned with driver powers of 10%-100% and slice thicknesses from 2 to 10 mm. Two region-of-interest (ROI) approaches were applied: (A) fixed-location ROIs and (B) largest measurable ROIs. Stiffness maps were generated using the MMDI inversion algorithm. Statistical analysis included repeated measures ANOVA, paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Results:
Measured whole-liver stiffness varied modestly over the driver power range, with the effect reaching statistical significance in Method B analysis (p = 0.037). Measurements of individual slices varied more significantly with driver power (Method A: p = 0.031; Method B: p < 0.001). Slice thickness had a significant effect on individual slice measurements (Method B: p = 0.007) but not on whole-liver measurements. In phantom studies, both parameters significantly influenced stiffness (p < 0.001 to p = 0.017). ICCs indicated good to excellent repeatability in vivo (0.79-0.96) and moderate to good repeatability in the phantom (0.62-0.89).
Conclusion:
The results demonstrate that measured MRE-derived liver stiffness can be influenced by driver power and slice thickness, underscoring the need for standardization of these parameters in both clinical practice and research.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity

