Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Color Spot Test As a Presumptive Tool for the Rapid Detection of Synthetic Cathinones
Published on: February 5, 2018
Things We Do for No reason™: Reporting every child who ingests tetrahydrocannabinol to child protective services
Mical Raz1, Josh Gupta-Kagan2, Andrea G Asnes3
1University of Rochester and University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Insights
Recreational tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) product legalization has increased accidental ingestions. Hospitals should assess caregiver actions, not automatically report ingestions, to protect children from harmful child protective services (CPS) investigations.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Pediatrics
- Toxicology
Background:
- Legalization of recreational tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products has led to a rise in accidental pediatric ingestions.
- Current hospital protocols in some areas mandate reporting all THC ingestions to child protective services (CPS).
- This contrasts with reporting practices for other hazardous household substances, such as cleaners.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the necessity of automatic child protective services (CPS) reporting for all tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) ingestions.
- To advocate for a nuanced approach considering caregiver responsibility and product risks.
- To minimize potential harm to children from unnecessary CPS investigations.
Main Methods:
- Review of hospital admission data related to accidental ingestions.
- Analysis of current reporting protocols for THC versus other toxic household products.
- Ethical considerations of mandatory reporting versus individualized risk assessment.
Main Results:
- Accidental THC ingestions are increasing post-legalization.
- Automatic CPS reporting for THC ingestions may be disproportionate compared to risks from other substances.
- CPS investigations themselves can pose risks to child welfare.
Conclusions:
- Hospital providers should assess caregiver diligence and awareness of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) product dangers before mandatory reporting.
- A case-by-case evaluation is crucial to determine if an ingestion warrants child protective services (CPS) involvement.
- This approach aims to balance child safety with avoiding undue harm from investigations.
Abstract:
Legalization of recreational tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) containing products has led to increased hospital visits for accidental ingestions. In response, some hospitals require that care teams report all such ingestions to child protective services (CPS). Yet, ingestions of other household products, like cleaners with more capacity to harm children than THC, do not automatically trigger reporting. CPS investigations can cause harm. Instead of automatic reporting, hospitalists should consider whether the child's caregiver took reasonable steps to prevent unintentional ingestion and recognizes the dangers of child-friendly THC packaging. Hospital providers must explore the circumstances of each ingestion to determine which should trigger mandatory reporting.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison
CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios

