Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
Published on: April 5, 2024
Virtual Reality as an Intervention for Intraoperative Anxiety and Stress in Regional Anesthesia: A Randomized
Khulud Mansor1, Sayeda Ahmed Abdellatif2, Nareman Aly Mohamed2
1IBN-Sina College for Health Professions, Department of Nursing Nablus University for Vocational and Technical Education Nablus Palestine.
Background:
Regional anesthesia, while offering numerous clinical advantages, can paradoxically heighten intraoperative anxiety and stress due to patients remaining conscious throughout surgical procedures.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of immersive virtual reality (VR) on intraoperative anxiety, stress markers, and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing elective surgery under regional anesthesia.
Methods:
A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted from 20 July to 20 September 2024 at Rafidia Governmental Surgical Hospital, Nablus, Palestine. A total of 145 patients undergoing elective surgery under regional anesthesia were randomly assigned to either a VR group (n = 72) receiving immersive VR therapy using VR headset devices with standardized nature-based environments during intraoperative period, or a control group (n = 73) receiving standard hospital protocol care. Outcomes included anxiety assessed via State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and stress levels measured using Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). A per-protocol analysis was conducted for the primary outcomes.
Results:
The VR group demonstrated significantly reduced postoperative state anxiety scores (37.2 ± 15.3 vs. 52.9 ± 15.7, p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.01) and sustained trait anxiety reduction (40.1 ± 13.5 vs. 53.3 ± 15.0, p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.94). Perceived stress levels were significantly lower in the VR group postoperatively (21.1 ± 5.3 vs. 25.9 ± 5.8, p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.87). Patient satisfaction scores were substantially higher in VR group (8.6 ± 1.2 vs. 6.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.73). Postoperatively, a significantly higher proportion of patients using VR experienced mild state anxiety (77.8%) and mild trait anxiety (70.8%) compared to control group.
Conclusions:
Immersive VR is a safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention that significantly reduces intraoperative anxiety and stress while enhancing patient satisfaction during regional anesthesia in this study population. Given its safety profile, efficacy, and favorable economic profile, VR should be considered for integration into standard intraoperative care protocols, though further research is needed to confirm generalizability and cost-effectiveness.
Clinical Trial Registration:
This study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT07132216 on 20 August 2025. The trial protocol is available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07132216?id=NCT07132216&rank=1.
Related Concept Videos
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Stages of General Anesthesia
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...

