Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026
Patient Directed Recording of a Bipolar Three-Lead Electrocardiogram using a Smartwatch with ECG Function
Published on: December 11, 2019
A Deep Neural Network for Interpreting Wearable Electrocardiogram Data in Atrial Fibrillation: Prospective
Olli A Rantula1,2,3, Jukka A Lipponen4, Jari Halonen1,3
1School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, PO BOX 1627, Kuopio, 70211, Finland, 358 0294451111.
Background:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are common arrhythmias associated with the risk of ischemic stroke, which can be reduced with anticoagulation therapy. Thus, early diagnosis of AF and AFL is essential. However, diagnosis may be challenging due to the paroxysmal and asymptomatic nature of these arrhythmias.
Objective:
Current diagnostic workflows involve time-consuming and resource-intensive manual review of noisy signals and prolonged recordings. We evaluated a mobile system that combines a wireless wearable single-lead chest strap electrocardiogram (ECG) and a novel deep neural network (DNN)-based artificial intelligence (AI) method for detecting AF/AFL episodes, AF/AFL burden, and rhythm change and estimated the delay in the detection of rhythm change from AF/AFL to sinus rhythm. We also assessed the rhythm classification performance.
Methods:
A total of 116 patients with recent-onset AF or AFL undergoing cardioversion were monitored using a mobile single-lead chest strap ECG system. Simultaneously, a 3-lead Holter ECG served as the reference. The DNN-based AI analyzed the single-lead chest strap ECG data to detect AF/AFL, non-AF/AFLrhythm, and noninterpretable segments, as well as to estimate AF/AFL burden and detect rhythm change. Performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and intraclass correlation coefficient for AF and AFL burden estimation.
Results:
The sensitivity and specificity for detecting AF/AFL were 91.9% (204.9/223.0 h) and 99.6% (242.4/243.5 h), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting AF was 96.2% (191.5/199.0 h), whereas it was 55.8% (13.4/24.0 h) for detecting AFL. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value for AF/AFL detection were 99.5% (204.9/206.0 h) and 93.1% (242.4/260.5 h), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the AF/AFL burden estimated by the DNN-based AI method and that derived from the physician-interpreted reference ECG was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97; P<.001). Rhythm change detection occurred within 1 minute in most cases.
Conclusions:
The mobile single-lead chest strap ECG system powered by a DNN-based AI algorithm demonstrated strong performance in detecting AF, estimating AF burden, and recognizing rhythm change to sinus rhythm. This AI-driven approach enables automated and accurate rhythm analysis, supporting clinical decision-making. Further validation in real-world ambulatory settings is warranted.
