Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Disentangling computational and neural mechanisms of evaluation direction in value-based decision-making
Chunchun Chen1, Xin Lin1, Yilin Yang2
1Department of Psychology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China.
None:
Most value-based decision-making research rests on the implicit assumption that individuals typically evaluate options based on subjective preferences, favoring high-value alternatives. However, in certain contexts, the focus of information evaluation during decision-making processes may shift toward low-value evidence rather than high-value evidence. These two evaluation directions may dynamically alternate within a single decision episode to support the final decision. Yet prior studies have rarely disentangled these evaluation modes, which has limited our understanding of the cognitive and neural dynamics underlying changes in evaluation direction. This study recruited 36 participants and employed a value-based binary choice paradigm manipulating evaluation direction via task framing. While decision outcomes did not significantly differ across conditions, distinct computational and neural signatures emerged. Specifically, behavioral indicators and a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) revealed that low-value-directed evaluations were associated with longer reaction times, slower evidence accumulation, and higher decision thresholds, indicating increased deliberation. Electroencephalography (EEG) results further showed enhanced N200 and centro-parietal positivity (CPP) amplitudes in the low-value condition, reflecting greater value conflict and diminished value integration efficiency; simultaneously, increased alpha and beta desynchronization suggested heightened demand of attentional resources and stronger decision commitment. Together, these results demonstrate that value evaluation direction modulates the decision-making process across distinct temporal periods-from early value conflict to late-stage evidence accumulation and action preparation, revealing the underlying mechanisms of humans' flexible value encoding and providing a new methodological framework for analyzing multi-level value construction.
More Related Videos
07:42An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
Published on: August 2, 2018
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Framing Effects