Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Varicocele Treatment Through Enhanced Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 25, 2024
Hydrocelectomy under local anesthesia with systemic analgesic support: real-world feasibility and patient acceptance
Claudia Jaeger1, René Mager2, Gregor Duwe2
1Clinic and Polyclinic for Urology and Pediatric Urology, Universitätsmedizin Der Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. claudia.jaeger@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Purpose:
Following implementation of a standardized hydrocelectomy protocol under local anesthesia combined with systemic analgesia at a tertiary referral center, we evaluated its feasibility, safety, and patient acceptance.
Methods:
In this retrospective single-center study, 35 consecutive patients underwent hydrocelectomy between May 2024 and August 2025 via a standardized in situ spermatic cord block. All patients received protocol-based systemic analgesia (1 g metamizole i.v. and 7.5 mg piritramide s.c.). Anticoagulants were paused 48 h preoperatively and resumed postoperatively, while antiplatelet therapy was continued. The primary endpoint was completion without conversion to analgosedation or general anesthesia. Secondary endpoints included procedural pain (VAS), postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo), and patient satisfaction.
Results:
Hydrocelectomy was completed under local anesthesia and systemic analgesic support in 33/35 patients (94%). One patient required conversion to analgosedation, one to general anesthesia. Seventeen patients (48.5%) were ASA III-IV. Median peak procedural pain was moderate (VAS 6, IQR 0-8) and inversely correlated with age (ρ = - 0.485, p = 0.005). Two patients (5.7%) required surgical revision (Clavien-Dindo IIIb), and four minor complications were managed conservatively. No complications were attributed to the anesthetic technique, and no recurrence occurred within 90 days. Overall, 87.5% of patients were satisfied and would recommend it.
Conclusion:
Hydrocelectomy under local anesthesia combined with systemic analgesia is feasible, safe, and well tolerated. Despite transient moderate procedural pain, most patients did not require conversion to procedural sedation or general anesthesia, with high satisfaction. These results support a patient-centered, resource-efficient approach, particularly for older and comorbid patients, including those with ASA III-IV classification, and warrant further prospective evaluation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...

