Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
Published on: December 9, 2022
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Fracture Risk: A Systematic Literature Review and Pooled and Meta-Analysis of
Manar Elsayed1, Brianna Greenwood1, Xiaoming Wang2,3
1University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are indicated for numerous malignancies, but may have off-target effects called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Fractures are not considered irAEs, but ICIs may promote osteoclast activation, leading to fractures. This study aimed to evaluate fracture risk associated with ICI therapy using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a systematic literature review of phase II and III ICI RCTs in individuals with solid malignancies that reported fractures in PubMed and Embase from inception to September 25, 2024. Supplementary materials were reviewed for all eligible studies to ascertain fracture outcomes. Fractures were categorized as any fracture, osteoporotic, and pathologic. Pooled analysis, random-effects meta-analysis, and multivariate meta-regression were conducted to determine the overall risk of fracture in ICI users compared to non-ICI users. Two subgroup analyses were performed: (1) studies without an active comparator, and (2) studies without an active comparator and ≥ 6 months of ICI treatment. A total of 35 RCTs met the inclusion criteria (n = 23,404 patients). There were 91 fractures in ICI groups (66 osteoporotic and 5 pathologic), compared with 70 fractures in the controls (49 osteoporotic and 5 pathologic). Pooled analysis showed no significant association between ICI therapy and risk of any fracture (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.80-1.50, p = 0.54), osteoporotic fracture (1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-1.64, p = 0.48), or pathologic fracture (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.26-2.73, p = 0.79). Meta-analysis similarly showed no statistically significant differences. Meta-regression did not identify any variables associated with increased fracture risk. Statistical heterogeneity was non-significant (I2 = 0.0%). There was no statistically significant difference in reported fractures between ICI and non-ICI treatment groups. However, few studies reported fracture outcomes and observation periods for these studies were short. Longer-term comprehensive fracture-adverse-event reporting in ICI RCTs is needed to evaluate fracture risk in ICI users.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
