Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

486
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
486
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

358
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
358
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

1.3K
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
1.3K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation01:27

Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation

1.8K
Clark Hull's drive-reduction theory, introduced in the 1940s and 1950s and often termed the "push theory" of motivation, provides a framework for understanding how biological and learned drives influence behavior. Hull suggested that motivation originates from the need to alleviate physiological tension caused by unmet biological necessities. The theory proposes that when a basic need, such as hunger or sleep, goes unfulfilled, it creates an internal imbalance. This imbalance, or...
1.8K
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

385
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
385

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individual versus group-based interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity, functional, psychosocial and health outcomes.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Event-Informed Systematic Self-Reflections and Stress Reactivity Among Emerging Adults: Insights From an Ecological Momentary Assessment Experiment.

Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress·2026
Same author

A Longitudinal Analysis of a Motor Skill Parameter in Junior Triathletes from a Wearable Sensor.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

A meta-analytic review and conceptual model of the antecedents and outcomes of goal adjustment in response to striving difficulties.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Individual differences and self-regulatory factors are credible determinants of physiotherapy student performance on clinical placement: Insights from a measurement burst design study.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2025
Same author

Effort in oculomotor control: Role of instructions and reward on spatiotemporal eye movement dynamics.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same journal

Teams perform worse when newcomers hold critical information than when original group members do.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Auditory perceptual maps in humans and mice share common structures and predict perceptual decisions in discrimination learning.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Cross-cultural evidence for positive control and mind-mindedness as buffers for parental distress.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Why sycophantic LLMs may imperil interactive norms between humans.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Early detection of distinct language development in infants of mothers with severe mental illness using fNIRS.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Real-time cognitive-affective dynamics of failure feedback in a technology-based learning task.

Communications psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K

Motivation biases behavior but not perception.

Christian Wolf1, Markus Lappe2, Hugh Riddell3,4

  • 1Institute for Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. chr.wolf@uni-muenster.de.

Communications Psychology
|April 25, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Motivation influences behavior, not perception itself. This study challenges "motivated perception" by showing motivation affects how we look and respond, but not our fundamental sensory interpretation of the world.

More Related Videos

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

26.8K
Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning
07:43

Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning

Published on: August 8, 2015

20.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

26.8K
Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning
07:43

Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning

Published on: August 8, 2015

20.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Perception Research

Background:

  • The theory of
  • motivated perception
  • suggests motivation alters sensory interpretation.
  • However, empirical evidence is mixed due to methodological limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically investigate whether motivation directly impacts perception or merely biases behavior.
  • To differentiate between perceptual changes and behavioral responses influenced by motivation.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments assessed motivation (self-concordance, value) and perceptual dimensions (bias, sensitivity).
  • Investigated mediating mechanisms like gaze position and spatial attention.
  • Utilized smooth pursuit eye movements as an implicit measure of motion perception.

Main Results:

  • Motivation biased responses without altering underlying motion perception (Experiment 2).
  • Perceptual sensitivity and bias changes occurred only when participants controlled their gaze in ambiguous visual displays (Experiments 1, 3-4).

Conclusions:

  • Findings challenge the established
  • motivated perception
  • theory.
  • Suggest motivation influences attentional and response strategies (how we look and respond), rather than the core perceptual process.