Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

12:10
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
9.6K
Omitting Elective Pelvic Nodes Irradiation in High Risk Prostate Cancer: Report on 43 Consecutive Elderly Patients
Emanuele Chioccola1, Mara Caroprese1, Christina Amanda Goodyear1
1University Hospital Federico II, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Journal of Personalized Medicine
|April 27, 2026
Summary
Prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) shows excellent disease control and safety in elderly high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients. This approach may be a reasonable de-escalation strategy given competing mortality risks in this population.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Geriatric Oncology
Background:
- Standard treatment for high-risk prostate cancer (PC) involves radiotherapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).
- The role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in node-negative patients is debated, especially in elderly populations.
- This study evaluates prostate-only RT (PORT) and ADT outcomes in elderly patients with high-risk PC in a real-world setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy and safety of PORT combined with ADT in elderly patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
- To evaluate oncological endpoints including Biochemical Failure-Free Survival (BFFS), Disease-Free Survival (DFS), Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS), Prostate Cancer-Specific Survival (PCSS), and Overall Survival (OS).
- To determine if PORT represents a clinically reasonable treatment de-escalation strategy for this demographic.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 43 elderly patients (median age 76) with high-risk PC treated between 2016-2022.
- Patients received PORT (moderate hypofractionation) and ADT (median 24 months), with modern staging including PET/CT in 44.2%.
- Oncological endpoints were calculated from treatment initiation, with DFS defined as a composite of failure, recurrence, or salvage therapy.
Main Results:
- Median follow-up of 60 months yielded 100% 5- and 7-year BFFS.
- Estimated 5-year and 7-year DFS were 94.7% and 71.8%, respectively, with 9.3% experiencing radiological recurrence.
- Excellent 5- and 7-year MFS (97.6%, 88.7%), 100% PCSS, and 86.7% 5-year OS were observed, with low gastrointestinal toxicity.
Conclusions:
- PORT with long-term ADT and modern staging offers excellent disease control and safety in elderly high-risk PC patients.
- PORT appears to be a reasonable de-escalation strategy, considering the high rate of competing mortality in this population.
- Results are hypothesis-generating and require validation through prospective randomized trials.

