Muscle-Specific Dosing of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Post-Stroke Upper-Limb Spasticity: A Descriptive Literature Review
Małgorzata Cisowska-Adamiak1, Magdalena Mackiewicz-Milewska1, Elżbieta Dorota Miller2
1Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Skłodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Background:
Botulinum neurotoxin type A is widely used in the management of post-stroke upper-limb spasticity; however, many studies report total injected doses rather than muscle-specific dosing, limiting clinical applicability. This study aimed to evaluate how frequently muscle-level dosing protocols of onabotulinumtoxinA are reported and to assess consistency of dosing patterns across published studies.
Methods:
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Wiley/Cochrane Library, and EBSCO/CINAHL using a structured search strategy informed by PRISMA guidelines. Studies published within the last 10 years reporting on onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in post-stroke upper-limb spasticity with muscle-specific dosing data were included. Studies not providing muscle-level dosing or not allowing extraction of post-stroke upper-limb data were excluded. Data were summarized descriptively and compared across studies.
Results:
Twenty-seven full-text articles were assessed, and five studies met the inclusion criteria. Muscle-specific dosing was consistently reported for commonly treated muscles such as biceps brachii and wrist and finger flexors, whereas other muscles were less frequently targeted. Variability in dosing between studies was observed, particularly in multicenter real-world datasets. Standardized high-dose protocols contrasted with individualized dosing strategies, which generally showed more moderate dose ranges. Expert recommendations often suggest higher doses than those observed in routine clinical practice.
Conclusions:
Muscle-specific dosing of onabotulinumtoxinA in post-stroke upper-limb spasticity is reported infrequently, and substantial variability exists between studies and clinical practice. Standardized reporting of muscle-level dosing and its relationship to baseline spasticity severity is needed to improve clinical applicability and reproducibility.
More Related Videos
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024
14:56The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb
Published on: September 23, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic...
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
Peripherally acting skeletal muscle relaxants interfere with the neurotransmission at the neuromuscular end plate to induce paralysis during...
Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Centrally acting drugs are classified into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs such as baclofen, diazepam, and tizanidine inhibit spinal motor neurons and decrease muscle tone. Spasmolytic drugs are administered for severe and chronic spasms due to multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, stroke, and spinal cord and muscle injuries. However,...
