Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Isolating Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and CD4+ T cells from Sézary Syndrome Patients for Transcriptomic Profiling
Published on: October 14, 2021
Distinct subgroups of follicular dendritic cell sarcoma: insights from clinical, histologic and immunophenotypic
Hsin-Ni Li1,2, Ren Ching Wang3, Chuan-Han Chen4,5
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Abstract:
Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a rare neoplasm with morphologic and phenotypic features resembling those of normal follicular dendritic cells (FDCs). FDCS has been classified into two distinct entities based on their association with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV): classic FDCS (cFDCS) and EBV-positive inflammatory FDCS (EBV + IFDCS). Diagnosis relies on characteristic histopathology and immunohistochemistry using FDC markers and EBV in situ hybridization (EBER). This study aimed to compare the clinical presentations, histologic features, and immunoprofiles between these two entities in a Taiwanese cohort. We retrospectively reviewed histological features of in-house and consultation cases of FDCS. Immunohistochemistry with novel markers including serglycin (SRGN), FDC-secreted protein (FDCSP) was applied, together with conventional FDC markers (CD21, CD23, CD35) and EBER. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), a potential therapeutic marker, was additionally evaluated and scored. Clinical and histological parameters, inflammatory cell infiltration, mitotic rate, and PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) were compared statistically. We identified 30 patients including 16 cFDCS and 14 EBV + IFDCS. The median age was 56 years old (range, 22-80), with a female preponderance in EBV + IFDCS. EBV + IFDCS occurred exclusively in extra-nodal sites, while cFDCS more commonly involved lymph nodes. EBV + IFDCS showed significantly higher PD-L1 TPS (p = 0.012), more prominent inflammatory cell infiltration (90.0% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001) in the presence of germinal centers (50% vs. 6%, p = 0.012), and lower mitotic activity (0.5 vs. 2.5/10 HPFs, p = 0.002). We identified distinct clinical and histologic features, as well as differential PD-Ll expression between cFDCS and EBV + IFDCS, supporting their classification as separate entities. Further molecular studies are needed to investigate their pathogenesis.
More Related Videos
07:18Isolation and Characterization of Tumor-initiating Cells from Sarcoma Patient-derived Xenografts
Published on: June 13, 2019
07:43Four-color Fluorescence Immunohistochemistry of T-cell Subpopulations in Archival Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Human Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Samples
Published on: July 29, 2017