Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
Published on: January 21, 2017
Balancing benefit, harm, and uncertainty in diagnosis: determining the testing threshold in clinical practice
Erin H Yang1, Zaven Sargsyan2,3, Prathit A Kulkarni3,4
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Clinicians can improve diagnostic testing decisions by using testing thresholds. A novel framework incorporates patient and systemic factors, enhancing the accuracy and value of medical testing.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Medicine
- Medical Decision Making
- Diagnostic Testing
Background:
- Diagnostic testing is fundamental to clinical practice.
- Decisions regarding diagnostic tests range from simple to complex.
- Testing thresholds offer a structured approach to these decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel framework for analyzing testing thresholds.
- To incorporate patient-specific and broader contextual variables into testing threshold analysis.
- To guide clinicians in optimizing diagnostic testing for high-value care.
Main Methods:
- Developed a framework analyzing testing thresholds.
- Included patient-related variables: symptom amplitude, clinical course, patient preferences.
- Incorporated systemic variables: medical context, costs, public health concerns, test characteristics.
Main Results:
- The proposed framework expands the traditional testing threshold concept.
- Identified patient and systemic factors influencing testing threshold dynamics.
- Highlighted the variability of testing thresholds based on test quality and cost.
Conclusions:
- Testing thresholds are crucial for guiding diagnostic test decisions.
- A comprehensive framework considering patient and systemic factors enhances clinical decision-making.
- Testing thresholds are dynamic and require continuous calibration in evolving clinical scenarios.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...