GLIM‑Defined Malnutrition in Critically Ill Patients: A Comparison of Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 and Modified
He Gao1, Yang Yang2, Lingyi Mi1
1Department of Clinical Nutrition, Linping Campus, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 311100, People's Republic of China.
The modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) screening tool, when used with the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) framework, shows stronger associations with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients compared to the Nutrition Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002). This suggests mNUTRIC may be a more effective initial screening strategy for malnutrition in this population.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Nutrition
- Critical Care Medicine
- Nutritional Assessment
Background:
- Malnutrition is prevalent and prognostically significant in critically ill patients.
- Accurate nutritional screening is crucial for timely intervention in intensive care units (ICUs).
- The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) framework provides criteria for diagnosing malnutrition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the consistency of Nutrition Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002) and the modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) as initial screening tools within the GLIM framework.
- To assess the association of NRS-2002 and mNUTRIC with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.
- To explore the impact of nutritional treatment on outcomes in patients identified with malnutrition.
Main Methods:
- A prospective observational study involving 173 critically ill patients admitted to an ICU for at least 4 days.
- Nutritional risk screening was performed within 24 hours of admission using NRS-2002 and mNUTRIC.
- GLIM criteria were used for malnutrition diagnosis in patients screening positive; consistency and outcome associations were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Malnutrition prevalence was 18.5% (NRS-2002+GLIM) and 13.9% (mNUTRIC+GLIM), with substantial agreement between the tools (κ = 0.79).
- Malnutrition diagnosed via mNUTRIC+GLIM showed stronger associations with increased ICU sedation days, vasopressor use, and adverse discharge status.
- An exploratory subgroup analysis indicated lower in-hospital mortality in patients treated for malnutrition identified by mNUTRIC+GLIM.
Conclusions:
- Both NRS-2002+GLIM and mNUTRIC+GLIM demonstrate consistency and association with unfavorable outcomes in critically ill patients.
- The mNUTRIC+GLIM strategy exhibits superior prognostic value compared to NRS-2002+GLIM.
- mNUTRIC+GLIM is a potentially more appropriate screening strategy for identifying malnutrition and predicting outcomes in critically ill populations.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
