Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026
Therapeutic Massage for Psychological Well-being in Geriatric Oncology
Published on: May 22, 2026
Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a
Carla Amato1,2, Paolo Iovino2, Camilla Elena Magi3,2
1Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Objective:
To identify self-report self-care scales for patients with cancer and critically evaluate their measurement properties.
Design:
Systematic literature review based on COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology.
Data Sources:
A comprehensive search was conducted from database inception to March 2025 through PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and APA PsycINFO. Potentially eligible articles were also identified by consulting the reference lists of the included studies.
Eligibility Criteria:
Studies were eligible if they reported on the development or validation of self-report instruments measuring self-care in adult patients with cancer and provided data on at least one measurement property as defined by the COSMIN framework.
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed according to COSMIN criteria. A modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was applied to determine the level of evidence for each psychometric property and to formulate recommendations for instrument use.
Results:
30 studies involving 26 instruments were included. Three instruments, the self-management instrument for patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant therapy, the Self-Care of Oral Anticancer Agents Index and the Leuven questionnaire for Patient Self-care during Chemotherapy, were strongly recommended (Grade A) based on adequate content validity and internal consistency. In contrast, the Self-Care Agency Scale and the Breast Cancer-Related Lymphoedema Self-Care Scale were not recommended (Grade C) due to high-quality evidence for insufficient structural validity and internal consistency, respectively. Most instruments received a Grade B, indicating potential for use but requiring further validation.
Conclusions:
This review highlights several gaps in psychometric evaluations, emphasising the need for future research to conduct more rigorous assessments of the measurement properties of current instruments and to develop tools that measure self-care in a broader population of oncology patients.
Registration Number:
PROSPERO (CRD42024519219; 16 March 2024).
Related Concept Videos
01:21Cancer Survival Analysis
01:23Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
01:22Self-Report Tests of Personality
01:26Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques I
Conscientiousness
Conscientious individuals tend to be organized, responsible, and disciplined. They prioritize completing tasks and following structured routines,...
01:24Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring