Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

13.1K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.4K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

878
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
878
Role-Based Identity01:21

Role-Based Identity

306
Role-based identities are central to understanding how individuals navigate social environments by adopting distinct self-conceptions aligned with various societal roles. These identities are not fixed traits but are constructed through personal actions and the social feedback individuals receive in context-specific interactions. Each social role, such as student, teacher, or friend, carries a set of expectations and norms that influence how people think, feel, and behave within that...
306
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

376
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
376

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells impair tumor growth through IL-3 and TNF-dependent vascular damage.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Advances in gene cloning and functional genomics approaches for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) improvement.

The plant genome·2026
Same author

Electronic contribution of Frenkel defects to thermal conductivity in body centred cubic transition metals from first-principles study.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same author

Thermally driven tetrazine-to-triazole ring contraction mediated by hydroxylammonium cations.

Materials horizons·2026
Same author

Co-Occurring Genetic Mutations in Rett Syndrome and <i>MECP2</i>-Related Disorders-Clinical and Diagnostic Implications from a Case Series.

Genes·2026
Same author

Temporal Integration of Serum Proteomics, Metabolomics and MRI Tumor Volumetrics via Deep Learning Identifies Systemic Mediators of Glioblastoma Response to Chemoradiotherapy.

Research square·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1.3K

Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During Human-AI Decision-Making.

Shreya Chappidi1, Jatinder Singh2, Andra V Krauze3

  • 1University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, United States.

Arxiv
|April 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human-LLM archetypes, recurring interaction patterns, influence AI decision-making outcomes in high-stakes fields. Choosing the right archetype is crucial for effective human-AI collaboration and mitigating risks.

Keywords:
agreementcognitive forcingdecision controlhuman-AI interactionhuman-in-the-loop decision-makinglarge language models (LLMs)prompt designsystem design

More Related Videos

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
07:14

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

Published on: December 23, 2025

1.1K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1.3K
Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
07:14

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

Published on: December 23, 2025

1.1K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Sociotechnical Systems

Background:

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into high-stakes decision-making processes.
  • Understanding the sociotechnical factors governing human-LLM interaction is critical for effective collaboration.
  • Existing research lacks a structured framework for analyzing human-LLM roles in decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and define the concept of human-LLM archetypes as recurring sociotechnical interaction patterns.
  • To identify and categorize diverse human-LLM archetypes from existing literature.
  • To evaluate the impact of different archetypes on decision outcomes in clinical diagnostics.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a scoping literature review and thematic analysis of 113 papers on LLM-supported decision-making.
  • Developed 17 distinct human-LLM archetypes based on identified interaction patterns.
  • Evaluated archetype effects using real-world clinical diagnostic case studies.

Main Results:

  • Identified 17 distinct human-LLM archetypes structuring collaborative decision-making.
  • Demonstrated that the choice of human-LLM archetype significantly influences LLM outputs and diagnostic outcomes.
  • Highlighted tradeoffs related to decision control, social hierarchies, and information requirements.

Conclusions:

  • The selection of a human-LLM interaction archetype critically impacts AI-assisted decision-making.
  • Designers of human-AI systems must consider these archetypes to manage risks and optimize performance.
  • Further research is needed to explore the implications of specific archetypes in various high-stakes domains.