Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026
A Bedside, Single Burr Hole Approach to Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Brain Injury
Published on: March 26, 2019
To Drain or Not to Drain? The Manchester Buckle Study
Peter Kiraly1,2,3, Myrta Lippera1,4, Naseer Ally5
1Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Purpose:
To assess whether external drainage of subretinal fluid (SRF) improves anatomical or visual outcomes in scleral buckle surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
Methods:
Retrospective review of 609 primary scleral buckles performed at Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (2008-2023). Pre/intra-operative characteristics, drainage use, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and single-surgery anatomical success (SSAS) were analysed.
Results:
428 patients without SRF drainage and 181 with drainage were included. Groups were similar for age (p=0.33), preoperative BCVA (p=0.47), RRD type (dialysis vs. retinal hole, p=0.17), high myopia (p=0.52) and trauma (p=0.06). Drainage group had more macula-off RRDs (48 % vs 39 %, p=0.05) and were more often operated on by consultants (p<0.01). SSAS rates were 86.7 % with drainage and 83.6 % without (p=0.67). Final BCVA also showed no difference in all (p=0.47); macula-on (p=1.00); and macula-off eyes (p=0.17). After adjusting for age, high myopia, trauma, type of RRD, macula status, surgeon grade, external SRF drainage was not independently associated with either SSAS (OR=1.39, 95% CI 0.81-2.36, p=0.23) or postoperative BCVA (B= -0.023, 95% CI -0.093 to 0.048, p=0.532). Drainage caused subretinal haemorrhage in 34 eyes (18.8 %), almost all (32) small and localised to the drainage site; no endophthalmitis, retinal incarceration or vitreous loss occurred.
Conclusions:
External SRF drainage during scleral buckling is safe but did not improve SSAS or BCVA. Its use should remain individualized based on RRD characteristics and surgeon preference.
