Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Optimizing Surgical Choice in Mild and Moderate OSA: Anterior Palatoplasty vs. Radiofrequency Uvulopalatoplasty
Ionut Tanase1, Mircea-Sorin Ciolofan2, Codrut-Caius Sarafoleanu1
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Background:
Surgical palatal techniques are established alternatives to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in selective patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with retropalatal airway collapse. Anterior palatoplasty (AP) stiffens and advances the soft palate, whereas radiofrequency-assisted uvulopalatoplasty (RF-UPP) uses thermal ablation to reduce palatal tissue. This study aimed to compare the 6-month efficacy and morbidity of AP vs. RF-UPP in treating mild-to-moderate OSA.
Materials And Methods:
We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study (March 2023-March 2025) of 86 adults (mean age ~42 years; 69.8% male) with mild-moderate OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 5-30) due to palatal obstruction; 43 patients underwent AP and 43 patients underwent RF-UPP. Polysomnographic AHI, Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), snoring severity (0-10 visual analog scale, VAS) and sleep-related quality of life (functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire, FOSQ) were analyzed at baseline and 6 months postoperatively. Postoperative pain (0-10 VAS), recovery time, and bleeding events were also assessed.
Results:
Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (AHI ~22 vs. 21 events/h; ESS ~11 vs. 10; snoring VAS ~8.4 vs. 8.2 in AP vs. RF-UPP, all p > 0.1). At 6 months, the AP group achieved a greater mean AHI reduction than the RF-UPP group (-13.5 ± 7.5 vs. -8.0 ± 7.2, p < 0.001), with post-treatment AHI averaging 8.5 ± 6.0 vs. 13.2 ± 6.5 events/h (AP vs. RF-UPP). AP yielded a higher surgical success rate (34/43 (79.1%) vs. 23/43 (53.5%), p = 0.012), meeting the criteria of ≥50% AHI reduction to <15; p = 0.01. Subjective outcomes improved in both groups, but AP showed greater mean reductions in ESS (-5.5 vs. -3.1 points, p = 0.001) and snoring VAS (-5.7 vs. -3.1, p = 0.002). The improvements in ESS, snoring VAS, and FOSQ scores were observed in both groups, with significantly greater gains after AP. Postoperative pain and time to resumption of normal diet were higher in the AP group. No major complications occurred in either group.
Conclusions:
Anterior palatoplasty demonstrated superior efficacy to RF-UPP in mild-moderate OSA at the expense of increased postoperative pain and a longer recovery period. AP may offer a greater therapeutic benefit in appropriately selected patients with palatal obstruction.
More Related Videos
09:07Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
Published on: January 26, 2024
07:54Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016