Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

The Colon-26 Carcinoma Tumor-bearing Mouse as a Model for the Study of Cancer Cachexia
Published on: November 30, 2016
Myosteatosis and Sarcopenic Obesity in Men Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Rationale for
Nagi B Kumar1,2, Nathan Parker3, Jingsong Zhang2
1Cancer Epidemiology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
None:
Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is widely used in the management of prostate cancer (PCa) and remains a cornerstone of treatment across multiple disease settings. Although ADT contributes substantially to disease control, it also induces significant adverse metabolic and body composition changes. These alterations include loss of lean mass, increased fat mass, and deterioration in muscle quality, together contributing to a clinical phenotype consistent with sarcopenic obesity (SO). Importantly, ADT-induced SO is characterized not only by reductions in skeletal muscle mass but also by impaired muscle quality, particularly the fatty infiltration of skeletal muscle, or myosteatosis, an underrecognized but defining feature of this syndrome. Methods: This narrative review examines current evidence regarding interventions aimed at mitigating sarcopenic obesity in men treated with ADT for prostate cancer, identifies key gaps in the literature, and proposes a mechanism-driven path forward for intervention development. Results: Several exercise- and nutrition-based interventions have been evaluated in men receiving ADT and demonstrate improvements in selected outcomes such as muscle strength, body composition, and metabolic parameters. However, most studies have been limited by small sample sizes, short intervention durations, and a focus on isolated intervention components. Importantly, muscle quality and intramuscular fat infiltration (myosteatosis), a central component of sarcopenic obesity, have rarely been incorporated as biomarkers or endpoints in intervention trials targeting men receiving ADT. Conclusions: Future interventions designed to mitigate SO and its associated metabolic abnormalities should evaluate comprehensive, bundled strategies initiated early during ADT and sustained long enough to capture clinically meaningful changes. Outcomes should include biomarkers of muscle mass, strength, and quality, including imaging-based measures of myosteatosis, along with metabolic syndrome markers, inflammatory mediators, functional outcomes, adherence, and quality of life. These changes should evaluate the correlation with underlying biological mechanisms such as NF-κB signaling and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Such data may inform future phase III trials and ultimately support clinical strategies to mitigate ADT-related sarcopenic obesity and its downstream cardiometabolic and oncologic consequences.
Related Concept Videos
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Cushing Syndrome II: Pathophysiology
Obesity
Cirrhosis I: Introduction
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Metabolism and Excretion

