Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
High-Risk Cardiomyopathy Genotypes and Arrhythmic Risk: LMNA, FLNC, RBM20, PLN and Desmosomal Genes in the ESC 2023
Nardi Tetaj1,2, Andrea Segreti1,2, Aurora Ferro1,2
1Cardiology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico Hospital University, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Insights
Inherited cardiomyopathies increase risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Genotype-specific risk stratification, guided by new ESC 2023 guidelines, improves personalized prevention strategies beyond traditional measures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Inherited cardiomyopathies are a leading cause of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD), often without significant systolic dysfunction.
- Current risk stratification relies heavily on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), which inadequately addresses the heterogeneity of non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.
- Advances in cardiac genetics and imaging reveal genotypes linked to disproportionate arrhythmic risk preceding ventricular remodeling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review cardiomyopathy-associated genotypes with high arrhythmic risk.
- To examine molecular mechanisms, phenotypic trajectories, and arrhythmogenic profiles of these genotypes.
- To discuss genotype-informed strategies for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) decision-making in SCD prevention.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review synthesizing genetic, imaging, and clinical evidence.
- Focus on specific high-arrhythmic-risk genotypes: LMNA, FLNC, RBM20, PLN p.Arg14del, and desmosomal genes.
- Integration of findings with the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines on cardiomyopathies.
Main Results:
- Specific genotypes (e.g., LMNA, FLNC, RBM20, PLN p.Arg14del, desmosomal genes) are consistently linked to increased VA and SCD risk.
- Genotype-specific myocardial fibrosis, conduction disease, and VA patterns influence risk.
- The 2023 ESC Guidelines integrate etiology, substrate, and electrical phenotype for improved risk stratification.
Conclusions:
- Genotype-informed strategies represent a paradigm shift in personalized SCD prevention for inherited cardiomyopathies.
- Understanding genotype-specific arrhythmogenic profiles enhances ICD decision-making beyond LVEF.
- Further research is needed to address remaining gaps in evidence and risk prediction.
Abstract:
Inherited cardiomyopathies represent a major cause of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD), frequently occurring in the absence of advanced systolic dysfunction. Traditional strategies for the primary prevention of SCD have relied predominantly on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), an approach that fails to capture the substantial biological and clinical heterogeneity of non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. Over the past decade, advances in cardiac genetics and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging have identified specific genotypes associated with a disproportionate arrhythmic risk, which often precedes overt ventricular remodeling. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines on cardiomyopathies formalize this paradigm shift by integrating etiology, myocardial substrate, and electrical phenotype into contemporary risk stratification. In this narrative review, we focus on cardiomyopathy-associated genotypes consistently linked to high arrhythmic risk-LMNA, truncating variants in FLNC, RBM20, PLN p.Arg14del, and desmosomal genes-and examine their molecular mechanisms, phenotypic trajectories, and arrhythmogenic profiles. We discuss how genotype-specific patterns of myocardial fibrosis, conduction disease, and VA inform implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) decision-making beyond LVEF-based thresholds. By synthesizing genetic, imaging, and clinical evidence in light of ESC 2023 recommendations, this review highlights the evolving role of genotype-informed strategies in the personalized prevention of SCD and underscores remaining gaps in evidence and risk prediction.
More Related Videos
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
09:36Dual-Dye Optical Mapping of Hearts from RyR2R2474S Knock-In Mice of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia
Published on: December 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy