Gaps Between Guidelines and Practice in Patients with Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional...

Background/Objectives: The guideline targets for blood pressure (BP), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are frequently unmet, and physicians often misjudge control. This study aimed to characterize the real-world control of BP, HbA1c, and LDL-C in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension, herein called cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM), and to compare guideline-based versus physician-perceived disease control. Methods: We conducted SNAPSHOT-Brazil, a nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional study to gather real-world data on patients with CMM. The ESC guidelines defined the cardiovascular (CV) risk and control targets. Results: We included 451 patients with hypertension and T2D (median age 65 years; 60% female; 54% White). Most patients (98%) were on pharmacotherapy and reported high adherence (according to the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale). A very high CV risk predominated (78%); 22% of the patients were at a high risk. The guideline-defined control was achieved in 27% for BP, 34% for HbA1c, 13% for LDL-C, and 6% for both BP and LDL-C; only 3% met all three targets simultaneously. The physicians accurately stratified the CV risk in 49% of patients, while 50% had their CV risk underestimated. They systematically overestimated control in 29% of cases for BP, 35% for LDL-C, and 25% for both. The sensitivity ranged from 0.88 to 0.98; the positive predictive values ranged from 0.19 to 0.48, and the positive likelihood ratios ranged from 2.16 to 3.65. Conclusions: The SNAPSHOT-Brazil study revealed a low attainment of BP, HbA1c, and LDL-C targets, despite the widespread pharmacotherapy and the high self-reported adherence. The physicians consistently overestimated disease control and underestimated the CV risk.