Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

08:20
Capillary-based Centrifugal Microfluidic Device for Size-controllable Formation of Monodisperse Microdroplets
Published on: February 22, 2016
9.9K
3D-Printed Closed-Channel Spiral Inertial Microfluidic Device for Size-Based Particle Separation
Eda Ozyilmaz1,2, Gamze Gediz Ilis1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli 41400, Türkiye.
Micromachines
|May 4, 2026
Summary
This study demonstrates successful 3D-printed spiral inertial microfluidic devices for particle separation. Re-optimizing geometry for 3D printing achieved high collection efficiency and purity in monolithic devices.
Area of Science:
- Microfluidics
- Particle Separation
- 3D Printing
Background:
- Spiral inertial microfluidic devices offer high-throughput, size-based particle separation.
- Translating polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-optimized designs to 3D-printed channels faces printability and post-print clearing challenges.
- Previous PDMS studies achieved high separation with a 400×120µm spiral.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a faster, cost-effective manufacturing approach for spiral inertial microfluidic devices using 3D printing.
- To re-optimize the spiral geometry for manufacturability constraints in a fully 3D-printed, closed-channel device.
- To retain high particle separation performance in a monolithic 3D-printed format.
Main Methods:
- Re-optimized spiral geometry for 3D printing, focusing on manufacturability and channel clearing.
- Utilized particle-tracking simulations to optimize spiral development length for particle collection.
- Experimentally validated the performance of the 8-turn, 800×240µm 3D-printed device using fluorescent polystyrene particles.
Main Results:
- Successfully printed and cleared enclosed channels with cross-sections of 800×240µm and 1200×360µm.
- An 8-turn spiral design achieved 100% large-particle collection (12-24µm) and reduced small-particle crossover.
- Experimental validation showed 84% collection efficiency and 92% purity for 18µm target particles.
Conclusions:
- Spiral inertial separation is feasible in monolithic 3D-printed devices.
- Design re-optimization around the smallest reliably clearable enclosed cross-section and sufficient spiral length is crucial.
- This approach enables faster and more cost-effective production of high-performance microfluidic separation devices.
Keywords:
3D printingclosed-channel microfluidicsinertial microfluidicsmicrofluidicparticle separationspiral microchannels
