Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
Published on: April 20, 2016
Optimal Sensor Placement in Buildings: Earthquake Excitation
Farid Ghahari1,2, Daniel Swensen1, Hamid Haddadi1
1California Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA.
Abstract:
This study presents a methodology for determining the optimal placement of seismic sensors along the height of buildings to minimize the uncertainty in reconstructing structural responses at non-instrumented floors. Due to the extensive benefits of instrumentation-from model validation to damage detection and structural health monitoring-the number of instrumented structures is steadily increasing. However, to keep installation and maintenance costs within a reasonable range, structures are often instrumented sparsely. The response at non-instrumented locations is typically estimated using deterministic or probabilistic model-based, data-driven, or hybrid methods. Specifically, the authors recently proposed a method that combines a deterministic beam model with Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) to estimate responses at non-instrumented floors of an instrumented building. The present paper proposes a methodology to determine optimal sensor locations that minimize the uncertainty associated with this response estimation. This work is a sequel to a previous study that was limited to stationary excitation and extends the method to seismic excitations. The methodology is first verified through a numerical example and then applied to two real instrumented buildings. The results demonstrate that an average 40% reduction in uncertainty is achievable when sensors are positioned according to the proposed optimization approach, in comparison with a random distribution of sensors. Between the two real-life cases studied in this paper, the level of reduction in the response uncertainty is around 10% for the 52-story building because the existing sensors are almost uniformly distributed, while it is around 80% for the 73-story building because the existing sensors are distributed to measure the localized behavior of the building.
More Related Videos
10:52Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior
Published on: April 13, 2016
07:02Investigating the Potential of Singly Curved Thin Piezoelectric Transducers for Energy Harvesting and Structural Health Monitoring
Published on: November 14, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Modes of Standing Waves - I
Movement Joints in Buildings
The simplest type of movement joints, working joints, are...
Types of Building Separation Joints
Volume-change joints address the effects of expansion and contraction due to temperature and moisture variations. They are strategically placed at discontinuities in a building's mass where cracking is most likely and are spaced about 150 to 200...
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...