Plasmonic Nanopore Sensing to Probe the DNA Loading Status of Adeno-Associated Viruses

Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are a leading vector for gene therapy, yet their clinical utility is limited by the lack of robust quality control methods to distinguish between empty (AAV_empty), partially loaded (AAV_partial), and fully DNA loaded (AAV_full) capsids. Current analytical techniques provide partial insights but remain limited in sensitivity, throughput, or resolution. Here we present a multimodal plasmonic nanopore sensor that integrates optical trapping with electrical resistive-pulse sensing to characterize AAV9 capsids at the single-particle level in tens of μL sample volumes and fM range concentrations. As a model system, we employed AAV9 capsids not loaded with DNA, capsids loaded with a self-complementary 4.7 kbp DNA (AAV_scDNA), and ones loaded with single-stranded 4.7 kbp DNA (AAV_ssDNA). Ground-truth validation was performed with analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC). Nanosensor data were acquired concurrently for optical step changes (occurring at AAV trapping and un-trapping) both in transmittance and reflectance geometries, and electrical nanopore resistive pulse signatures, making for a total of five data dimensions. The acquired data was then filtered and clustered by Gaussian mixture models (GMMs), accompanied by spectral clustering stability analysis, to successfully separate between AAV species based on their DNA load status (AAV_empty, AAV_partial, AAV_full) and DNA load type (AAV_scDNA versus AAV_ssDNA). The motivation for quantifying the AAV_empty and AAV_partial population fractions is that they reduce treatment efficacy and increase immunogenicity. Likewise, the motivation to identify AAV_scDNA population fractions is that these have much higher transfection rates. Importantly, the results showed that the nanosensor could differentiate between AAV_scDNA and AAV_ssDNA despite their identical masses. In contrast, AUC could not differentiate between AAV_scDNA and AAV_ssDNA. An equimolar mixture of AAV_scDNA, AAV_ssDNA and AAV_empty was also measured with the sensor, and the results showed the expected population fractions, supporting the capacity of the method to differentiate AAV load status in heterogeneous solutions. In addition, less common optical and electrical signal signatures were identified in the acquired data, which were attributed to debris, rapid entry re-entry to the optical trap, or weak optical trap exits, representing critical artifacts to recognize for correct interpretation of the data. Together, these findings establish plasmonic nanopore sensing as a promising platform for quantifying AAV DNA loading status and genome type with the potential to extend ultra-sensitive single-particle characterization beyond the capabilities of existing methods.