Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploratory Evaluation of Dual Digital Platforms for Acute Brain Conditions in Medically Underserved Rural Areas : A Chuncheon, Gangwon-do Experience.

Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society·2026
Same author

Diverse mediators of cancer predisposition uncovered by germline whole genome sequencing of unexplained familial cancers.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Biodegradable capacitive sensors for biomedical applications: sensitivity and lifetime.

Biomedical engineering letters·2026
Same author

Egfl7 regulates embryonic angiogenesis and placental vascular function in mice.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2026
Same author

Aging Mediates Inflammatory Transformation of Kidney-Resident Macrophages via Thrombospondin-1 Signaling.

Immune network·2026
Same author

Soft, conformal tissue-electrode interfaces for bioelectronic devices: material, fabrication strategies, and applications.

Biomedical engineering letters·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication
16:38

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication

Published on: June 6, 2012

20.0K

Biocompatible design of bioresorbable electronics and materials.

Minki Hong1,2, Gilmo Kim1,2, Seunghun Han1,2

  • 1School of Biomedical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841 Republic of Korea.

Biomedical Engineering Letters
|May 4, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Biocompatibility for transient devices requires a multidimensional approach beyond basic cytotoxicity. This review details advances in bioresorbable electronics, focusing on immune responses and degradation for clinical translation.

Keywords:
BiocompatibilityBiomedical devicesBioresorbable electronicsISO 10993Immune response

More Related Videos

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro
14:49

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro

Published on: April 15, 2022

4.6K
Bidirectional Electrical and Optoelectronic Interfaces in Healthy and Ischemic Ex Vivo Rat Hearts
08:33

Bidirectional Electrical and Optoelectronic Interfaces in Healthy and Ischemic Ex Vivo Rat Hearts

Published on: July 18, 2025

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication
16:38

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication

Published on: June 6, 2012

20.0K
Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro
14:49

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro

Published on: April 15, 2022

4.6K
Bidirectional Electrical and Optoelectronic Interfaces in Healthy and Ischemic Ex Vivo Rat Hearts
08:33

Bidirectional Electrical and Optoelectronic Interfaces in Healthy and Ischemic Ex Vivo Rat Hearts

Published on: July 18, 2025

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Traditional biocompatibility definitions are insufficient for advanced bioresorbable electronics.
  • Emerging transient devices require a multidimensional assessment of biocompatibility.
  • Clinical translation hinges on understanding device-material interactions with biological systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advances in bioresorbable materials and electronics (transient devices).
  • To emphasize how material selection, device architecture, and degradation influence immune responses and tissue integration.
  • To critically discuss current biocompatibility standards and propose future research directions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focused on biocompatibility of transient devices.
  • Comparative framework correlating material classes with immune outcomes and degradation.
  • Critical analysis of existing biocompatibility evaluation metrics and ISO 10993 standards.

Main Results:

  • Bioresorbable electronics necessitate multidimensional biocompatibility: immune modulation, mechanical/electrical matching, controlled degradation, and functional stability.
  • Material properties, device design, and degradation kinetics are key determinants of biological response.
  • Current standards require re-evaluation for transient bioelectronic systems.

Conclusions:

  • Next-generation bioresorbable electronics demand a holistic biocompatibility evaluation.
  • Design guidelines and updated standards are crucial for accelerating clinical translation.
  • Future research should focus on predictive models for immune response and degradation behavior.