Unsuccessful Clinical Trials in Retina: Lessons Learned

Julie Tran1, Jay Chhablani2

  • 1From the Duquesne University College of Osteopathic Medicine (DUQCOM) (J.T.), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Abstract

Insights

High attrition rates plague late-stage retinal clinical trials. Improving trial design, endpoint selection, and operational factors is crucial for successful drug development in ophthalmology.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Retinal Diseases

Background:

  • Retinal drug development faces significant challenges in translating early-stage successes to late-phase trials.
  • High attrition rates are a persistent issue in interventional retinal clinical trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze patterns of non-success in US-based phase 2 and 3 interventional retinal clinical trials from 2015-2025.
  • Identify recurring design, feasibility, and operational challenges contributing to trial failures.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of unsuccessful clinical trials (terminated, withdrawn, or failed primary endpoints).
  • Evaluation across indications (diabetic macular edema, retinopathy, AMD, geographic atrophy), trial phases, intervention classes, and mechanisms of action.

Main Results:

  • High attrition observed in diabetic macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, neovascular AMD, and geographic atrophy.
  • Phase 2 trials often discontinued post-interim analysis; Phase 3 trials frequently missed primary efficacy endpoints.
  • Later-phase trials showed increased complexity (sample size, duration, burden); endpoint selection and operational factors contributed to failures.

Conclusions:

  • Translating early retinal research findings into successful late-stage outcomes remains difficult.
  • Enhancing alignment between biological rationale, endpoint selection, and operational feasibility is key to improving trial success rates in ophthalmology.