Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.0K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.0K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.4K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
9.4K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

8.9K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
8.9K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.7K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.7K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.5K
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

4.3K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Perception of Novel Consonant Clusters: A Comparison of Salience and Sonority.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

SingleMALD: Investigating practice effects in auditory lexical decision.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

The Mason-Alberta Phonetic Segmenter: a forced alignment system based on deep neural networks and interpolation.

Phonetica·2024
Same author

Documenting and modeling the acoustic variability of intervocalic alveolar taps in conversational Peninsular Spanish.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2024
Same author

Semantic richness effects in isolated spoken word recognition: Evidence from massive auditory lexical decision.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2022
Same journal

Comparing the roles of f0, speech rate, and timbre in expressing and perceiving politeness in Mandarin speech.

Phonetica·2026
Same journal

Speech prosody: from acoustics to interpretation.

Phonetica·2026
Same journal

What determines the success of AI voice-cloned speech? Prosodic and acoustic evidence on three TTS systems.

Phonetica·2026
Same journal

The effects of native phonotactic experience, cross-language perceptual similarity, and non-native phonological merger on Mandarin speakers' perception of Cantonese syllable-final segments.

Phonetica·2026
Same journal

Variation and change in the production of te reo Māori closing vowel sequences.

Phonetica·2026
Same journal

Overcoming stress deafness: the interplay of musical acuity and L2 proficiency in Czech learners' perception of English stress.

Phonetica·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
14:08

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images

Published on: April 13, 2013

43.7K

Gradient boundaries through confidence intervals for forced alignment estimates using model ensembles.

Matthew C Kelley1

  • 1Linguistics Program, Department of English, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.

Phonetica
|May 5, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces gradient boundaries for audio alignment, offering more realistic segment transitions and indicating model uncertainty. This method improves boundary accuracy and aids in identifying segments needing review.

Keywords:
acoustic modelingautomatic speech recognitionforced alignmentphoneticsspeech segmentation

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
14:08

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images

Published on: April 13, 2013

43.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Speech processing
  • Computational linguistics
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Forced alignment tools typically provide single point-estimates for audio segment boundaries.
  • Accurate boundary detection is crucial for various speech analysis tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel method for producing gradient boundaries in forced alignment using neural network ensembles.
  • To represent segment transitions more realistically and quantify boundary placement uncertainty.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an ensemble of ten previously trained segment classifier neural networks.
  • Repeated the alignment process with each network and aggregated results using order statistics.
  • Derived confidence intervals to establish gradient boundary ranges around a median estimate.

Main Results:

  • The ensemble method produced gradient boundaries, offering a more realistic representation of segment transitions.
  • A 97.85% confidence interval was used to define the gradient range, indicating model uncertainty.
  • Ensemble boundaries showed slight overall improvement in accuracy on the Buckeye and TIMIT corpora compared to single models.

Conclusions:

  • Gradient boundaries provide a more nuanced and realistic representation of speech segment transitions.
  • The derived confidence intervals quantify model uncertainty, aiding in the identification of boundaries requiring manual review.
  • This approach offers potential improvements in forced alignment accuracy and facilitates further statistical analysis.