Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Evaluating Breast Implants Characteristics and Replacements in BIA-ALCL Onset: A Multicenter Case-Control study
Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo1, Demosthenes Panagiotakos2, Mark Warren Clemens3
1Chair of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs (NESMOS), Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Background:
Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an uncommon malignancy caused by textured implants. Specific implant characteristics or replacement patterns were investigated in relation to BIA-ALCL onset.
Methods:
In this multicenter, retrospective case-control study, data were collected from 327 women (39±13 years) with breast implants and no malignancy, and 94 age-matched BIA-ALCL cases (1:4 matching), across one U.S. and two European centers. Surgery indication, implant manufacturer, volume, surface texture, indwelling time, and history of replacements were analyzed. Associations with BIA-ALCL were assessed using conditional logistic regression analysis.
Results:
All BIA-ALCL cases were linked to implant roughness >10µm. Implant volume was positively associated with 81% higher likelihood of BIA-ALCL (OR per 100cc= 1.81, 95%CI [1.35, 2.44]). Breast reconstruction was associated with 47% lower odds of BIA-ALCL compared to cosmetic augmentations (OR= 0.53, 95%CI [0.33, 0.85]). One implant replacement was associated with 82% lower likelihood of BIA-ALCL compared to no replacement (OR= 0.18, 95%CI [0.10, 0.31]). Replacing from textured to smooth (OR= 0.06; 95% CI [0.013, 0.303]) or smooth to textured implants (OR= 0.06; 95% CI [0.013, 0.303]) had significantly lower likelihood of BIA-ALCL, compared to receiving another textured implant.
Conclusion:
Study findings of no BIA-ALCL association to specific manufacturers or to implant roughness <10µm, support the evidence that surgeons and patients should consider breast implant roughness in treatment decisions among primary or secondary asymptomatic patients.
More Related Videos
06:03Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
Published on: February 6, 2020
03:07Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025