Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Is Adjuvant Chemotherapy Necessary for All Patients with pT3N0 Rectal Cancer after Upfront Surgery? A Multicenter
Kyong-Min Kang1, Ho Yung Lee1, Hong-Min Ahn1
1Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Purpose:
The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in pathologic T3N0 (pT3N0) rectal cancer, which has a favorable prognosis, remains controversial because high-risk groups for recurrence are not well defined. This study investigated prognostic factors for survival in this patient group and evaluated the benefit of ACT based on these factors.
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed 352 patients with pT3N0 rectal cancer who underwent upfront radical surgery at three referral hospitals between November 2003 and December 2020. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to identify the prognostic factors for 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Patients were categorized as high or low risk based on these factors, and survival outcomes were compared between those who received ACT and those who did not, using the log-rank test.
Results:
Median follow-up was 52.8 months. 193 (54.8%) patients received ACT. Multivariable analysis revealed that ACT, circumferential resection margin (CRM) ≤ 2mm, vascular invasion, and perineural invasion were independent predictors of 5-year RFS. In patients with ≥ 1 risk factor, ACT significantly improved RFS (92.5% vs. 72.8%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.247, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.090-0.683, p < 0.01). In those without risk factors, no significant benefit was observed (98.0% vs. 91.6%, HR 0.272, 95% CI 0.057-1.313, p=0.082).
Conclusion:
This study identified CRM ≤ 2mm, vascular invasion, and perineural invasion as high-risk features for recurrence in pT3N0 rectal cancer. ACT improved RFS only in patients with these features. While these findings support risk-based ACT administration in this patient population, further validation of our risk stratification system is needed.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:22Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
Published on: June 13, 2025