Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification and Mechanical Properties of Synthetic Polymers01:28

Classification and Mechanical Properties of Synthetic Polymers

22
Synthetic polymers are classified as elastomers, fibers, or plastics based on their crystallinity. Crystallinity, the degree of long-range order in the solid state, influences the mechanical properties (stretching or contracting) of elastomers. Elastomers are flexible polymers that can expand or contract easily upon the application of an external force. They have numerous crosslinks that pull them back into their original shape when stress is removed. Silicones, for instance, are highly elastic...
22
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

36.0K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
36.0K
Molecular Orbital Theory I02:35

Molecular Orbital Theory I

39.8K
Overview of Molecular Orbital Theory
39.8K
Intermolecular Forces and Physical Properties02:56

Intermolecular Forces and Physical Properties

23.3K
23.3K
Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

9.1K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
9.1K
Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids02:26

Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids

50.2K
Particles in a solid are tightly packed together (fixed shape) and often arranged in a regular pattern; in a liquid, they are close together with no regular arrangement (no fixed shape); in a gas, they are far apart with no regular arrangement (no fixed shape). Particles in a solid vibrate about fixed positions (cannot flow) and do not generally move in relation to one another; in a liquid, they move past each other (can flow) but remain in essentially constant contact; in a gas, they move...
50.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

QUASAR: A Universal Autonomous System for Atomistic Simulation and a Benchmark of Its Capabilities.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Xenon/Krypton Separation on a Bromine Functionalized Benzimidazole-Linked Porous Covalent Organic Polymer.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

Bias-Deletion Metadynamics Revealing Volume-Rotation Coupling Mechanisms in Metal-Organic Frameworks.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

A new class of customisable stable boronic ester assemblies.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Material Preparation Information File (MPIF): A Community-Driven Standard for Reporting MOF Syntheses.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same author

Rhodium Carbonyl Complexes within the Tunable Microenvironments of UiO-66 Analogues.

Inorganic chemistry·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

6.0K

Evaluating mechanical property prediction across material classes using molecular dynamics simulations with universal

Konstantin Stracke1, Connor W Edwards1, Jack D Evans2

  • 1School of Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Communications Chemistry
|May 5, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Universal machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) show promise for materials simulation. While generally accurate, they tend to underestimate bulk modulus and overestimate thermal expansion, with dataset quality being key to performance.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.8K
Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization
08:03

Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization

Published on: November 12, 2014

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

6.0K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.8K
Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization
08:03

Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization

Published on: November 12, 2014

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Accurate simulation of material properties requires precise interatomic interactions.
  • Quantum-mechanical methods are computationally expensive for large-scale simulations.
  • Universal machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) offer a computationally efficient alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy of six universal MLIPs for predicting temperature and pressure responses in diverse materials.
  • To evaluate MLIPs' performance in calculating bulk modulus, thermal expansion, and thermal decomposition.
  • To identify key factors influencing MLIP accuracy for materials simulation.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated six universal MLIPs across three architectures (GNNs, GNS, Graph Transformers).
  • Tested models on 13 diverse materials, including metal-organic frameworks and inorganic compounds.
  • Calculated bulk modulus, thermal expansion, and thermal decomposition for each material and model.

Main Results:

  • Observed qualitative agreement with experimental data, outperforming UFF4MOF.
  • Systematic underestimation of bulk modulus and overestimation of thermal expansion were noted across models.
  • 'MACE-MP-0a', 'fairchem_OMAT', and 'Orb-v3' emerged as top performers with average errors around 41-43%.
  • Dataset homogeneity and structural representation significantly impact model accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Universal MLIPs provide a viable alternative to quantum-mechanical methods for materials simulation.
  • Model performance is sensitive to training data quality and representation.
  • Further development is needed to achieve truly universal and highly accurate MLIPs for diverse material dynamics.