Comparison of Allergic Rhinitis Treatments on Utilities and Quality of Life: A MASK-air Study

Allergic rhinitis displays a relevant impact on quality of life. Medications used in the treatment of rhinitis have been assessed on their impact on rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality of life, but not on generic health-related quality of life metrics, such as utilities or EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) levels. This study aimed to compare different medication classes and individual medications on utilities and EQ-5D VAS levels using data from a mobile app.

We conducted an observational study using direct patient data from the MASK-air mobile application, collected between May 2015 and December 2024. We compared rhinitis medication classes and individual medications on health utilities (computed from the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire) and the EQ-5D VAS. To account for confounding, we employed inverse probability treatment weighting based on propensity scores, adjusting for demographics, baseline symptom control, and asthma status.

The study analysed 69,973 observations with EQ-5D VAS data and 842 observations with utility data. At the medication class level, fixed combinations of intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids were associated with improvements in EQ-5D VAS (mean difference = 1.900; 95% CI = 1.316-2.484) and utilities (mean difference = 0.022; 95% CI = -0.015 to 0.059) compared with oral antihistamines (OAH). Intranasal antihistamines were associated with lower EQ-5D VAS and utility scores than other intranasal treatments. For individual medications, mometasone was associated with a lower EQ-5D VAS than budesonide and fluticasone furoate, while fexofenadine and levocetirizine tended to be associated with lower VAS values than other OAH.

Fixed combinations of intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids were associated with better quality-of-life than oral antihistamines and intranasal antihistamines. These findings could support future cost-effectiveness analyses.