Continuous Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block vs Epidural Analgesia for Pediatric Hip Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort

Lloyd M Halpern1, Zackary Correll2, De-An Zhang3

  • 1Department of Anesthesia, Shriners Children's Hospital, Spokane, WA, USA.

Insights

Continuous suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (CSFI) provided similar opioid needs as continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) initially. CSFI led to less pain medication, earlier movement, and shorter hospital stays in pediatric patients undergoing hip surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Anesthesiology
  • Regional Anesthesia
  • Pain Management

Background:

  • Pediatric orthopedic surgery for proximal femur and acetabulum procedures often requires effective pain management.
  • Continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) is a common method, but alternatives are sought.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare continuous suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (CSFI) with CEA for pediatric proximal femur and acetabulum procedures.
  • To evaluate opioid requirements, pain scores, sedation, mobilization, and length of stay.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 82 pediatric patients undergoing proximal femur or acetabulum surgery.
  • Comparison of daily opioid requirements, pain, sedation, ambulation time, and hospital stay between CSFI and CEA groups.

Main Results:

  • No difference in opioid requirements when blocks were in place.
  • CSFI group showed reduced opioid use post-epidural removal, earlier ambulation, shorter hospital stay, and less sedation.
  • 8.5% of CSFI patients experienced transient thigh numbness.

Conclusions:

  • CSFI offers advantages over CEA for pediatric hip surgery, including reduced opioid consumption post-removal, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stays.
  • Potential for persistent thigh numbness with CSFI requires further investigation.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia01:29

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia

Epidural anesthetics are administered in the fat-filled epidural space, the outermost part of the spinal canal. This technique is commonly employed for pain management and anesthesia during lower abdomen and pelvis surgeries or labor and delivery.
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia01:11

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia

Spinal anesthetics are given during lower abdomen and limb surgeries to block sensory and motor neurons. They are administered in the mid to low lumbar regions, primarily acting on the cauda equina's nerve roots. The blockade level depends on the local anesthetic (LA) concentration. Usually, low LA concentrations are sufficient to block sensory fibers, while only high LA concentrations block motor fibers. Other factors like injection volume and speed, the patient's posture, and the drug...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia01:16

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

Intravenous regional anesthesia or the Bier block technique is used to anesthetize a specific limb or extremity. It uses exsanguinated or blood-drained vessels to transport local anesthetics or LAs to the peripheral nerve trunks. Lidocaine without vasoconstrictors like epinephrine is most commonly used for this technique. Other drugs used are prilocaine, ropivacaine, and chloroprocaine. Bupivacaine is not recommended for this technique due to its high cardiac toxicity.
One of the advantages of...