Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
IMPACT OF FLUORESCENT DYES ON MUTATIONS IN NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING LIRBARY PREPARATION
Vincent L Butty1, Pranav Patel2, Stuart S Levine1
1Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Fluorescent DNA dyes like SYBR and EvaGreen show minimal mutagenic effects during PCR amplification, even with sensitive sequencing. These intercalating dyes have a negligible impact on mutation rates for most applications.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Fluorescent DNA-binding dyes (e.g., ethidium bromide) were historically considered mutagenic.
- The potential for these dyes to induce mutations during DNA replication persists, despite recent research.
- Real-time PCR instruments use fluorescent dyes for amplification monitoring, raising concerns about mutations in downstream sequencing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the mutagenic impact of SYBR and EvaGreen dyes during iconPCR amplification.
- To assess the effect of these dyes on mutation calling and mutational signatures in sequencing data.
- To determine the significance of dye-induced mutations in fluorescence-guided amplification for downstream analyses.
Main Methods:
- Samples were amplified using the iconPCR instrument with SYBR or EvaGreen.
- Routine mutation calling was performed on amplified samples.
- Mutational signature analysis was conducted to identify dye-specific mutation patterns.
- Sequence analysis focused on substitutions and indel domains.
Main Results:
- Sequence analysis revealed minimal impact of fluorescent dyes on PCR reactions.
- Observed changes in mutation rates were subtle and largely within the experimental noise.
- Mutational signature analysis did not identify significant signatures attributable to the dyes.
- No key signatures were found for either substitutions or indels related to dye use.
Conclusions:
- Intercalating fluorescent dyes have a minimal mutational impact during fluorescence-guided amplification.
- The mutagenic effects of SYBR and EvaGreen are negligible for most sequencing applications.
- Dye-induced mutations can be disregarded except in highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies.
More Related Videos
13:24Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
13:26Automated Gel Size Selection to Improve the Quality of Next-generation Sequencing Libraries Prepared from Environmental Water Samples
Published on: April 17, 2015