Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Divergence and Stokes' Theorems01:06

Divergence and Stokes' Theorems

The divergence and Stokes' theorems are a variation of Green's theorem in a higher dimension. They are also a generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus. The divergence theorem and Stokes' theorem are in a way similar to each other; The divergence theorem relates to the dot product of a vector, while Stokes' theorem relates to the curl of a vector. Many applications in physics and engineering make use of the divergence and Stokes' theorems, enabling us to write numerous physical laws...
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

FMRP attenuates Tau pathology through the CDK5/p35 signaling pathway.

Neurobiology of disease·2025
Same author

Development and Validation of an Explainable Prediction Model to Assess the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease in Young and Middle-Aged Individuals.

Reviews in cardiovascular medicine·2025
Same author

A Rare Case of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Abscess Caused by Coinfection of <i>Actinomyces Turicensis</i> and <i>Actinotignum Schaalii</i>: A Case Report.

Infection and drug resistance·2025
Same author

Large Carnivores Persisting in a Human-Dominated Landscape: Suitable Habitat and Connectivity for Asiatic Black Bears in China.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Tailoring nanofiltration membrane via low temperature-assisted layer-by-layer interfacial polymerization for highly efficient ion selective separation and resource recovery.

Water research·2025
Same author

Population Density and Spatial-Temporal Activity Pattern of the Tibetan Wolf in Dulan, Qinghai, China.

Biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

Non-target divergence hypothesis: Toward understanding modality differences in cross-modal knowledge distillation.

Yilong Chen1, Zongyi Xu2, Xiaoshui Huang3

  • 1Chongqing Key Laboratory of Image Cognition, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, No. 2 Chongwen Road, Chongqing, 400065, China; Chongqing Water Resources and Electric Engineering College, No. 801 Changzhou Avenue, Chongqing, 402160, China.

Neural Networks : the Official Journal of the International Neural Network Society
|May 7, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Cross-modal knowledge distillation (KD) is improved by minimizing non-target class divergence, as proposed by the Non-Target Divergence Hypothesis (NTDH). This finding, supported by VC theory and experiments, enhances student model performance.

Keywords:
Cross-modal knowledge distillationModality differences

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Computer Vision

Background:

  • Cross-modal knowledge distillation (KD) presents unique challenges due to inherent modality differences.
  • Existing research has not fully elucidated how these modality differences impact KD performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate the Non-Target Divergence Hypothesis (NTDH) explaining the effect of modality differences in cross-modal KD.
  • To theoretically analyze the relationship between non-target divergence and student performance using Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) theory.

Main Methods:

  • Formulated the Non-Target Divergence Hypothesis (NTDH).
  • Conducted theoretical analysis using Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) theory to derive an error bound.
  • Performed extensive experiments on five diverse cross-modal datasets.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that modality differences primarily impact cross-modal KD via non-target class prediction divergences.
  • Showed that minimizing non-target divergence leads to improved student model performance.
  • Validated the effectiveness and generality of NTDH across multiple datasets.

Conclusions:

  • The Non-Target Divergence Hypothesis (NTDH) provides a novel explanation for challenges in cross-modal KD.
  • Reducing non-target divergence is a key strategy for enhancing cross-modal KD.
  • The findings have practical implications for improving multimodal learning models.