Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

07:19
A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
Published on: March 19, 2020
Influence of Reactive Balance Training Program Characteristics on Reactive Balance Control and Fall Risk: A
Hadas Nachmani1, Laura Kathleen Langer2, Augustine Joshua Devasahayam2,3
1Department of Physical Therapy, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Gerontology
|May 8, 2026
Summary
Reactive Balance Training (RBT) using manual perturbations may reduce falls. However, optimal RBT characteristics remain unclear due to inconsistent study details and low-quality evidence for improving balance control and preventing falls.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Rehabilitation Science
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Age-related decline in reactive balance control increases fall risk.
- Reactive Balance Training (RBT) aims to mitigate this but has variable intervention characteristics and outcomes.
- Optimal RBT delivery methods for improving balance and preventing falls are not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of RBT.
- To identify optimal intervention characteristics for RBT to enhance reactive balance control.
- To determine effective RBT strategies for preventing falls in daily life.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PEDro, Cochrane) up to July/August 2023.
- Inclusion of RCTs reporting reactive balance control and/or falls in daily life.
- Meta-regression analysis to explore the impact of intervention features on outcomes, with Risk of Bias and GRADE assessments.
Main Results:
- 32 studies were included; 25 reported balance outcomes, 19 reported falls.
- RBT programs using manual perturbations showed reduced fall rates compared to waist-pull perturbations (RR 0.45, p=0.042).
- No other training parameters consistently correlated with improved reactive balance or reduced falls; evidence quality was low to very low.
Conclusions:
- Optimal RBT characteristics remain unclear due to significant protocol variability and underreporting in existing studies.
- Manual perturbations may be more effective for fall reduction than waist-pull methods.
- Future RBT research requires standardized, detailed protocols and reporting of both balance and fall outcomes.