Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

12:10
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
PI-RADS v2 and Adverse Prostate Cancer Outcomes: A Cross-cohort Replication Study Across Three Centers.
Tolou Shadbahr1, Juho Pylväläinen2, Juho Eineluoto3
1Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
European Urology Oncology
|May 8, 2026
Summary
High Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores, particularly PI-RADS 5, indicate an increased risk of adverse prostate cancer outcomes. This finding can aid in MRI-based diagnosis and prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Oncology
- Urology
Background:
- Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis relies on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS).
- Limited follow-up data has hindered exploration of the association between PI-RADS and clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between PI-RADS scores and key clinical endpoints in prostate cancer.
- To evaluate the prognostic value of PI-RADS in diverse patient cohorts.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of three cohorts (Helsinki, Tampere, Lille) from the PI-RADS v2 era.
- Investigated associations between PI-RADS scores and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and biochemical recurrence (BCR).
Main Results:
- PI-RADS score 5 was significantly associated with PCSM in the Helsinki cohort (HR 18.4).
- PI-RADS score 5 also correlated with OS, MFS, and BCR across different cohorts.
- Biopsy Gleason Grade 5 and Charlson's Comorbidity Index were also associated with adverse outcomes.
Conclusions:
- A PI-RADS score of 5 is linked to a higher risk of adverse prostate cancer outcomes.
- These findings support the use of PI-RADS in clinical decision-making for PCa diagnosis and prognosis.
- The study highlights the prognostic utility of MRI-based PI-RADS scoring.