Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence the...
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence the...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A fully automated benchmarking suite to compare macromolecular complexes.

Nature methods·2025
Same author

Single-amino acid variants in target epitopes can confer resistance to antibody-based therapies.

Science translational medicine·2025
Same author

Meeko: Molecule Parametrization and Software Interoperability for Docking and Beyond.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

Progress and Bottlenecks for Deep Learning in Computational Structure Biology: CASP Round XVI.

Proteins·2025
Same author

Protein Target Highlights in CASP16: Insights From the Structure Providers.

Proteins·2025
Same author

Assessment of Pharmaceutical Protein-Ligand Pose and Affinity Predictions in CASP16.

Proteins·2025
Same journal

Genome-wide absolute quantification of chromatin looping.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same journal

Putting numbers on chromatin looping.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same journal

Transcriptional readthrough progresses from incidental byproduct to therapeutic opportunity.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same journal

Distinct ATRX functions cooperate with 9-1-1 and CST complexes to safeguard replication and telomere integrity.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same journal

Structurally defining neurokinin selectivity to improve NK2R agonists.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same journal

Surveying the roles of NINJ1 in plasma membrane rupture.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Evaluating generalization in protein-ligand cofolding methods.

Peter Škrinjar1,2, Jérôme Eberhardt1,2, Gabriel Studer1,2

  • 1Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
|May 8, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning accurately predicts protein structures but struggles with small-molecule interactions. A new benchmark dataset reveals current cofolding methods primarily memorize data, limiting their use in drug discovery.

More Related Videos

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy
09:30

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy

Published on: July 19, 2024

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound
10:21

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound

Published on: February 23, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy
09:30

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy

Published on: July 19, 2024

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound
10:21

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound

Published on: February 23, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Drug Discovery
  • Structural Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Deep learning has advanced protein structure prediction.
  • Predicting protein-ligand interactions is crucial for drug discovery.
  • Existing cofolding methods lack comprehensive performance evaluation due to insufficient benchmarking datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate leading all-atom cofolding methods.
  • To introduce a new, high-resolution benchmark dataset, Runs N' Poses, for protein-ligand systems.
  • To assess the capabilities of current deep learning methods for predicting protein-ligand interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and utilized the Runs N' Poses benchmark dataset, containing 2,600 protein-ligand systems.
  • Evaluated four state-of-the-art all-atom cofolding methods.
  • Assessed method performance against the new benchmark, focusing on generalization beyond training data.

Main Results:

  • Current cofolding methods demonstrate a tendency to memorize ligand poses from their training data.
  • Performance on the Runs N' Poses dataset indicates limited generalization capabilities.
  • The benchmark dataset highlights the shortcomings of existing approaches for novel predictions.

Conclusions:

  • Existing cofolding methods are not yet suitable for de novo drug design due to memorization.
  • The Runs N' Poses dataset provides a realistic benchmark for future method development.
  • Further research is needed to develop cofolding methods that generalize effectively for accurate protein-ligand interaction prediction.