Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
Published on: February 22, 2019
Global patterns of pertussis incidence and vaccination strategies: implications of divergent surveillance data
Kangguo Li1, Yulun Xie1, Jiadong Wu1
1State Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, National Innovation Platform for Industry-Education Integration in Vaccine Research, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Insights
Pertussis (whooping cough) control requires careful vaccine strategy. Comparing WHO and GBD data revealed significant differences in pertussis incidence, highlighting the need for harmonized surveillance data for accurate global health insights.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Immunology
Background:
- Pertussis (whooping cough) poses a significant global health risk to infants, with recent increases in cases prompting a reevaluation of vaccination strategies.
- Maternal pertussis immunization offers benefits beyond passive antibody transfer, potentially involving complex maternal-infant immune interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare pertussis incidence data from WHO notifications and GBD modeled estimates.
- To assess how associations between vaccination policy indicators and pertussis incidence vary across different data sources and outcome definitions.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Joinpoint regression to characterize incidence trends.
- Employed Bayesian hierarchical models to estimate associations between vaccination policies and incidence, accounting for Universal Health Coverage.
- Compared data from World Health Organization (WHO) routine notifications and Global Burden of Disease (GBD) modeled estimates.
Main Results:
- Significant discrepancies were observed in pertussis incidence levels and trends between WHO and GBD datasets.
- Unadjusted analyses indicated varied, sometimes contradictory, associations for maternal immunization and vaccination schedule timing.
- After adjustment, DTP3 (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis) vaccine coverage showed a strong inverse association with incidence in GBD data, but not in WHO data.
Conclusions:
- WHO and GBD estimates for pertussis incidence are not interchangeable and should not be interpreted similarly.
- Robust cross-country inferences necessitate harmonized data constructs and detailed metadata on surveillance implementation and ascertainment.
Abstract:
Pertussis remains a global threat for infants, and recent increases in notifications have renewed interest in optimising vaccination strategies and improving vaccines. At the biological level, the rationale for maternal pertussis immunization extends beyond passive antibody transfer alone and may also involve broader maternal-infant immune interactions; however, at the population level these mechanisms are operationalized through policy adoption, timing recommendations, and coverage. We compared incidence constructs from WHO routine notifications and Global Burden of Disease (GBD) modelled estimates and assessed how associations with vaccination policy indicators change across outcome definitions. Trends were characterised with Joinpoint regression; policy associations were estimated using Bayesian hierarchical models fitted separately to each dataset with Universal Health Coverage stratified random intercepts. Incidence levels and trends differed markedly between WHO and GBD. Unadjusted analyses showed heterogeneous, sometimes opposing, associations for maternal immunization and schedule timing. After adjustment, most schedule parameters were small and imprecise, whereas DTP3 coverage remained strongly inversely associated with incidence in GBD but not in WHO. Surveillance and modelled estimates should not be interpreted interchangeably; harmonized constructs and routine implementation and ascertainment metadata are needed for robust cross-country inference.
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence
Vaccinations
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

