Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Machine Learning Models in the Prediction of Adverse Outcomes in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Meta-Analysis
Bharadhwaj Ravindhran1, Laila Ubhi2, Shahani Nazir2
1Academic Vascular Surgical Unit, Centre for clinical sciences, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Machine learning (ML) models significantly outperform traditional methods in predicting adverse outcomes for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients. This review highlights ML
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular research
- Medical informatics
- Machine learning applications in healthcare
Background:
- Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) poses significant risks for adverse cardiovascular and limb events.
- Accurate prediction of these outcomes is crucial for patient management.
- Existing statistical methods may have limitations in capturing complex predictive patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare the performance of machine learning (ML) models against traditional statistical approaches for predicting adverse outcomes in PAD patients.
- To assess the current limitations and challenges in ML model development and validation for PAD.
- To provide insights into the future of predictive modeling in PAD management.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive systematic search of major medical and trial databases (2000-2025) for studies using ML in PAD outcome prediction.
- Independent screening, data extraction, and quality/bias assessment using PROBAST and an AI/ML-specific tool.
- Modified Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (HSROC) analysis and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) calculation to compare ML and regression models for MACE and MALE prediction.
Main Results:
- Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, evaluating various ML models and traditional regression.
- Gradient boosted models showed the highest predictive performance for major adverse limb events (MALE) with a DOR of 36.593.
- All evaluated ML models demonstrated moderate to high predictive ability, consistently outperforming traditional regression models (lowest DOR 3.326).
- Methodological quality varied, with 54% of studies rated as low risk of bias.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning techniques offer superior predictive power for adverse outcomes in PAD patients compared to traditional regression methods.
- ML models, particularly gradient boosted approaches, show significant promise for improving risk stratification in PAD.
- Further research focusing on robust ML model development and validation is warranted to optimize clinical application.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests