Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

A Porcine Model of Acute Autologous Pulmonary Embolism
Published on: September 6, 2024
Comparative analysis of clinical decision tools for acute pulmonary embolism at a tertiary care center
Ashis Tiwari1, Sukh Dayal Kumhar1, Praveen Kumar Tagore1
1Department of General Medicine, Government Medical College, Datia, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Abstract:
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) requires accurate risk stratification to guide intensive care versus safe discharge decisions. Therefore, it is of interest to compare original Pneumonia Severity Index (PESI) versus Simplified Pneumonia Severity Index (sPESI) in 410 acute PE patients for predicting 30-day mortality and adverse outcomes. Both indices showed excellent negative predictive values (NPVs) (>98%) for mortality, with sPESI demonstrating higher sensitivity (94.1% vs 89.5%). Original PESI had slightly superior risk discrimination (AUC 0.78 vs 0.75), but sPESI proved more clinically practical. sPESI advances PE management as the preferred bedside tool for identifying low-risk patients suitable for outpatient care.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies