Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks
Published on: June 9, 2023
Benchmarking physics-inspired machine learning models for transition metal complexes with diverse charge and spin
Yuri Cho1,2, Ksenia R Briling1, Yannick Calvino Alonso1,2
1Laboratory for Computational Molecular Design, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland clemence.corminboeuf@epfl.ch.
Physics-inspired machine learning models were benchmarked for predicting transition metal complex properties. Models incorporating electronic information, especially geometric deep learning, showed superior accuracy for electronically sensitive properties.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Materials Science
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Physics-inspired machine learning (ML) models are crucial for predicting quantum-chemical properties.
- These models can be structure-based or incorporate electronic information.
- Transition metal complexes present unique challenges due to diverse charge and spin states.
Purpose of the Study:
- To benchmark structure-only vs. structure-and-electronic ML models for transition metal complexes.
- To evaluate performance across diverse quantum-chemical properties and datasets.
- To provide guidance on selecting appropriate physics-based ML models.
Main Methods:
- Benchmarking kernel ridge regression with molecular representations (SLATM, FCHL, SOAP, SPAHM).
- Evaluating geometric deep learning models (MACE, 3DMol).
- Assessing models with and without electronic information (charge and spin embeddings).
Main Results:
- Models with electronic information outperformed structure-only models for spin-splitting and frontier orbital energies.
- Structure-only models performed well for HOMO-LUMO gap and dipole moment magnitude.
- Geometric deep learning models (MACE-QS, 3DMol-QS) achieved highest accuracy, with 3DMol offering best efficiency.
Conclusions:
- Electronic information is essential for properties governed by electronic characters.
- Geometric information alone suffices for certain properties (e.g., HOMO-LUMO gap).
- Geometric deep learning models with charge/spin embeddings offer a powerful approach for transition metal complex property prediction.
More Related Videos
11:04Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Determining the Structure and Mechanisms of Metal Ion Recognition and Redox Activity of Metal Binding Oligopeptides
Published on: September 7, 2019
05:37Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization
Published on: August 22, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Properties of Transition Metals
Trends in Lattice Energy: Ion Size and Charge