Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Effective General Practice-Led Interventions to Increase Uptake in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review.
Anna M Kelly1, Stephanie C Walker, Georgia Carney
1Author Affiliations: The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, and Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia (Kelly, Walker, Carney, Levu, and Feletto); Walker is now with the School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, High St, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia; Cancer Elimination Collaboration, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Kelly and Feletto); Cancer Institute NSW, New South Wales, Australia (Horn); Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (Jenkins); and Implementation to Impact (i2i), School of Population Health, UNSW, New South Wales, Australia (Taylor).
General practice can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation through various interventions. However, more research is needed on implementation strategies for sustained real-world application.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Preventive Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Primary care, particularly general practice, is crucial for public health.
- General practice settings are effective for increasing participation in organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence on interventions to increase CRC screening participation.
- To evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of general practice-led interventions using systematic reviews with meta-analyses (SRMAs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Main Methods:
- A scoping review involving an umbrella review of SRMAs and a review of RCTs.
- Searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo databases (May 2016-August 2023).
- Assessed intervention effectiveness and implementation strategies using established frameworks and taxonomies.
Main Results:
- Fifteen SRMAs and 12 RCTs were included, examining individual, primary care, and population-level interventions.
- Patient reminders, risk assessment tools, and kit outreach interventions showed effectiveness in improving CRC screening participation.
- Multicomponent interventions show promise, but none of the RCTs explicitly detailed implementation strategies.
Conclusions:
- Individual, primary care, and population-level interventions, potentially combined, can enhance CRC screening.
- A significant gap exists in documented implementation strategies needed for intervention adaptation and sustainability.
- Future research should focus on mobilizing general practice for CRC screening promotion, integrating targeted implementation strategies for real-world success.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...