Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

04:44
Imaging Features of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
Published on: June 16, 2020
Integrated imaging-informed and machine learning-based prognostic models for risk stratification in connective tissue
Yao Xu1, Jinpeng Hou1, Dong Yan2
1Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Clinical Rheumatology
|May 11, 2026
Summary
Integrating imaging data into prognostic models significantly improves predictions for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). Machine learning models incorporating fibrosis extent, DLCO, and age offer superior risk stratification for CTD-ILD patients.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonology and Radiology
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) has variable outcomes, and current prognostic tools like the ILD-GAP score lack precision.
- There is a need for improved prognostic models that incorporate imaging data to better stratify CTD-ILD patient risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and externally validate integrated prognostic systems for CTD-ILD risk stratification.
- To compare the prognostic discrimination of imaging-derived fibrosis measures against traditional physiology-based models.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter retrospective study enrolled patients with CTD-ILD.
- Three prognostic systems were evaluated: System A (ILD-GAP and fibrosis score), System B (composite model), and System C (machine learning models).
- Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with internal and external validation.
Main Results:
- The fibrosis score showed better discrimination than the ILD-GAP index in external validation (AUC 0.798 vs. 0.768).
- Machine learning models achieved the highest discrimination (Random Forest AUC 0.833, Support Vector Machine AUC 0.826).
- SHAP analysis identified fibrosis extent, DLCO, and age as key predictors of adverse outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Imaging-informed and data-driven models significantly improve prognostic discrimination in CTD-ILD compared to traditional indices.
- The fibrosis score is crucial for outcome prediction, with composite and machine learning models offering refined, individualized risk stratification.
- Combining imaging (fibrosis extent) and physiological data (DLCO, age) enhances prognostic accuracy for CTD-ILD.
