Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Heterotypic Three-dimensional In Vitro Modeling of Stromal-Epithelial Interactions During Ovarian Cancer Initiation and Progression
Published on: August 28, 2012
An Updated Conceptual Framework for Myoepithelial Tumors of Soft tissues and Bone: Toward a Molecularly Informed
Michael Michal1, Josephine K Dermawan2
1Biopticka Laborator Ltd., Pilsen, Czech Republic; Department of Pathology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
None:
Myoepithelial tumors (MET) of soft tissue and bone comprise a rare group of neoplasms unified by partially overlapping morphology and so called myoepithelial immunophenotype. Historically, MET have long posed diagnostic and prognostic challenges. Grading and risk stratification have relied largely on the presence of cytologic atypia. Recent molecular and epigenetic studies have fundamentally revised this concept, demonstrating that MET represent a biologically heterogeneous family rather than a single disease entity. Soft tissue (mostly deep-seated) and osseous MET frequently harbor recurrent gene fusions, most commonly involving FET family genes (EWSR1 or less often FUS) with partners such as POU5F1, PBX1, PBX3, KLF15, KLF17, and ZNF444, and more rarely non-FET fusions including SS18::POU5F1. These fusion types correlate with reproducible clinicopathologic patterns and, in emerging outcome datasets, with subtype-specific differences in behavior. In contrast, superficially located adnexal tumors with ductal differentiation - representing true cutaneous mixed tumors/myoepitheliomas - typically lack EWSR1/FUS rearrangements and instead show PLAG1 rearrangements, supporting a bona fide myoepithelial origin and close relationship to PLAG1-driven salivary gland counterparts. Additional complexity arises from SMARCB1-deficient, fusion-negative tumors and a small subset lacking identifiable recurrent drivers, as well as substantial overlap in morphology and immunophenotype with multiple MET mimics, contributing to diagnostic misclassification when using morphology and immunohistochemistry alone. To address these issues, we synthesize clinicopathologic, molecular, methylomic and pooled outcome data across major MET subgroups from recent multi-institutional cohorts, highlighting pronounced epigenetic and clinical heterogeneity and providing practical diagnostic guidance for surgical pathologists. We propose a molecularly informed classification framework that improves diagnostic precision, clarifies terminology - particularly distinguishing PLAG1-rearranged cutaneous salivary-gland analogs from fusion-associated soft tissue/bone sarcomas with myoepithelial-like phenotype - and lays a foundation for refined prognostic stratification and future therapeutic studies.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Overview
Based on the number of cell layers,...
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Stratified Epithelium
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Glandular Epithelium
Multicellular glands are formed during early development when epithelial budding...
Metastasis
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition
The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition or EMT is a developmental process commonly observed in wound healing, embryogenesis, and cancer metastasis. EMT is induced by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) or receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) ligands, which further...
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Simple Epithelium
Because of the thinness of the cells, simple squamous epithelium is present where the rapid passage of chemical compounds is observed. For example, the endothelium that lines the capillaries and vessels...
The Tumor Microenvironment
