Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing
Published on: May 8, 2021
Stability of urinalysis in two different preservative tubes: A comparative analysis
Nilüfer Bayraktar1, Eren Vurgun2, Seyyide Nur Savran1
1Department of Medical Biochemistry, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
None:
BackgroundSample stability represents a major challenge in the preanalytical phase of urinalysis. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the stability of urine samples stored at room temperature for up to 72 h in two commercially available chlorhexidine-based preservative tubes.MethodsThe study included 44 pathological urine samples. Urinalysis was performed after storage in BD Vacutainer® and Vacusera® tubes at 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h. These results were compared with those obtained from refrigerated, non-additive polystyrene (PS) tubes at 0, 4, and 8 h. A level of ≥90% agreement or a kappa value (κ) of ≥0.8 was deemed to represent perfect agreement and stability.ResultsSpecific gravity, pH, glucose, bilirubin, urobilinogen and nitrite were stable in all tubes and conditions. Within the first 4 h, instability was detected in protein in the non-additive PS tube, in ketone and red blood cells (RBC) in the BD tube, and in white blood cells (WBC) in all tubes. By the 8-h mark, ketone and RBC in the non-additive PS tube, as well as bacteria count in the BD tube, failed to maintain stability. Notably, blood and leukocyte esterase remained stable for at least 8 h across all tubes.ConclusionsStorage of urine samples in chlorhexidine-based preservative tubes has minimal impact on urinalysis; however, inter-manufacturer variability exists. To ensure reliable results, analysis should be performed within 4-8 h of collection.
Related Concept Videos
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
