Can ChatGPT Replace Human Clinical Coders? A Comparative Study in Otology Billing.

Area of Science:

• Medical informatics
• Artificial intelligence in healthcare
• Surgical coding and billing

Background:

• Accurate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code assignment is crucial for medical billing and reimbursement in otologic surgery.
• Manual coding is time-consuming and prone to errors, necessitating exploration of automated solutions.

Purpose of the Study:

• To evaluate the utility of large language models (LLMs), specifically ChatGPT (versions 3.5 and 4), in analyzing operative notes for CPT code generation.
• To compare the performance of ChatGPT in assigning CPT codes against human clinical coders in an otology practice.

Main Methods:

• 191 otologic operative notes from a single surgeon were analyzed using ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.
• Performance was assessed by comparing generated CPT codes to existing billing data, calculating exact and partial match rates, sensitivity, specificity, and work Relative Value Unit (wRVU) differences.

Main Results:

• ChatGPT-4 achieved 14% exact and 33% partial CPT code matches, while ChatGPT-3.5 achieved 22% exact and 32% partial matches.
• High sensitivity and specificity were observed for cochlear implantation (CI) coding (ChatGPT-4: 96% sensitivity, 92% specificity).
• Performance was significantly lower for complex procedures like cartilage grafting, and both models tended to underbill wRVUs compared to human coders.

Conclusions:

• ChatGPT demonstrates potential for automating CPT code assignment in otologic surgery, particularly for procedures like cochlear implantation.
• Current LLM performance is limited by challenges with complex cases, modifier application, and accurate wRVU valuation.
• Further development and validation are needed to optimize LLMs for reliable and comprehensive medical billing automation.