Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
Published on: July 17, 2012
Automated MR spectroscopy single voxel placement in suspected diffuse glioma based on tumor anatomy
Saahil Chadha1,2, Sarah M Jacobs1,3, Tal Zeevi1
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Background:
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) complements conventional MRI in brain tumor diagnosis by measuring metabolites associated with various molecular pathways. However, inconsistent and inaccurate voxel placement, due to limited experience and time constraints, has hindered its clinical use. There is a critical need for greater precision and efficiency in MRS voxel placement, which could be addressed by an algorithm leveraging tumor anatomy to facilitate the automation of this process. This pilot study aimed to design and validate an automated, AI-driven MRS voxel placement tool to evaluate suspected diffuse gliomas.
Methods:
In this pilot study, the MRS single voxel auto-placement algorithm utilizes tumor sub-compartment segmentation from a pre-trained deep learning model. Preprocessing involves co-registration and isotropic resampling of multiparametric MRI. The algorithm iteratively adjusts the position and rotation of an MRS voxel mask over the segmented images to maximize enhancing tumor core inclusion while excluding necrosis. Two board-certified neuroradiologists independently and blindly assessed algorithm- and clinically-placed MRS voxels (n = 14) using a Likert scale.
Results:
Fourteen cases of MRS single-voxel placement were evaluated (median age and interquartile range, 47 years [24-64 years]; male, 10 patients [71%]). Overall quality ratings of 4 or 5 were assigned to 75% of clinically placed voxels and 79% of algorithm-placed voxels, without any statistical difference (P = .56). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were observed in position ratings (P = .30) or rotation ratings (P = .51).
Conclusions:
No statistically significant differences were observed between algorithm- and clinically placed voxels, highlighting the promise of AI-based automated MRS single-voxel placement.

