Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
From risk to results: Multi-arterial coronary bypass approaches in high-risk cohorts
Alexandra N Schwann1, Irbaz Hameed1, Thomas A Schwann2
1Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.
Insights
Multi-arterial bypass grafting offers improved outcomes over single-arterial methods in general surgery. This review examines its survival benefit in high-risk patients, considering bilateral internal thoracic arteries and left internal thoracic with radial artery grafts.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Multi-arterial bypass grafting (MABG) demonstrates improved patient outcomes compared to single-arterial bypass grafting (SABG) in general surgical revascularization.
- The survival benefit of MABG in high-risk patient sub-cohorts remains less defined, questioning its increased technical complexity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence on MABG versus SABG in higher-risk patient cohorts.
- To discuss the value of MABG in specific patient populations undergoing surgical coronary revascularization.
Main Methods:
- Review of current evidence comparing MABG and SABG in high-risk patients.
- Focus on bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) and left internal thoracic artery (LITA) with radial artery (RA) grafts.
Main Results:
- Evidence suggests MABG may offer survival benefits in certain high-risk groups, though further research is needed.
- The technical aspects and graft choices (BITA, LITA+RA) influence outcomes.
Conclusions:
- MABG may be advantageous in select high-risk patients, justifying its complexity.
- Choosing appropriate MABG techniques is crucial for optimizing surgical coronary revascularization outcomes.
Abstract:
Over the past 30 years, multi-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting techniques have been shown to be associated with improved patient outcomes compared to the current standard, single-arterial coronary bypass grafting technique, in the general patient population undergoing surgical coronary revascularization. Whether a survival benefit exists in high-risk patient sub-cohorts is less well defined, calling into question the value of the higher technical complexity of multi-arterial bypass grafting. Herein, we review the most current evidence for multi-arterial bypass grafting versus single arterial bypass grafting in several higher-risk patient cohorts. Discussion will focus on the two most common techniques for multi-arterial bypass grafting: the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries and the use of the left internal thoracic artery in conjunction with the radial artery with or without supplemental saphenous vein grafts.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
