Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
Published on: December 6, 2024
Adversity, psychological strengths, and well-being during collective trauma: Results from a nationally
Xumeng Yan1, Nickolas M Jones2, E Alison Holman2
1Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
Objective:
Guided by the resilience portfolio model, we examined associations between resilience profiles (defined by adversity exposure and psychological strengths) and well-being-related outcomes across 2 years during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Method:
A longitudinal, representative, probability-based sample of U.S. residents (N = 4,248) completed four surveys between March 2020 and May 2022. K-means clustering identified distinct profiles based on lifetime adversity exposure and psychological strengths, operationalized as four internal assets (i.e., positive affect, awe, cognitive reappraisal, and benefit finding). Sociodemographic indicators were explored as predictors of profile membership. Mixed-effects modeling evaluated how profiles correlated with well-being-related outcomes (global distress, functional impairment, emotional exhaustion) over time, adjusting for preexisting mental health conditions and pandemic-specific stressors.
Results:
Four profiles were identified: Profile 1: Lowest-Adversity/Mixed-Strengths (31.5%); Profile 2: Low-Adversity/High-Strengths (24.0%); Profile 3: Moderate-Adversity/Low-Strengths (26.0%); and Profile 4: High-Adversity/High-Strengths (18.5%). Compared to the reference group (Lowest-Adversity/Mixed-Strengths), Moderate-Adversity/Low-Strengths profile members reported higher global distress (p < .001), emotional exhaustion (p < .001), and functional impairment (p < .001). Low-Adversity/High-Strengths profile members showed comparable or slightly better well-being (p < .01 on emotional exhaustion) than the reference group. Despite higher adversity exposure, High-Adversity/High-Strengths profile members reported lower global distress (p < .001) and emotional exhaustion (p < .001) than the Moderate-Adversity/Low-Strengths profile. Female and Black respondents were more likely to belong to High-Strengths profiles (i.e., Low-Adversity/High-Strengths and High-Adversity/High-Strengths, ps < .05) than male and White respondents.
Conclusions:
Combinations of psychological strengths and adversity exposure correlated with well-being-related outcomes during collective trauma. Results underscore the value of including strengths-based, person-centered approaches in multidimensional resilience research and interventions, highlighting the need to foster multiple, complementary psychological strengths. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Stress and Lifestyle
Psychological Responses to Stress
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events, are a...
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques V
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...

