Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation (BreEStim) for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity
Published on: January 10, 2013
The Effect of Early Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Early Mobilization on Preventing the Intensive Care
Jun Wang1, Lihua Huang2,3, Chunna Lan4
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pingshan District Central Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Abstract:
IntroductionThe aim of this research is to examine the impact of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and early mobilization (EM) on preventing the intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) in lung cancer resection patients.MethodsThis was a single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized into NMES, EM, and control groups. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of ICU-AW, with secondary outcomes encompassing differences in handgrip strength, duration of stay in the ICU, and overall hospital length of stay across the groups.ResultsBoth interventions demonstrated significant reductions in ICU-AW incidence compared with the control group. The EM group had odds ratios of 0.10 (95% CI 0.03 - 0.31) at 2 days post-admission and 0.07 (95% CI 0.02 - 0.26) at ICU discharge, while the NMES group showed comparable reductions (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.02 - 0.23 and OR 0.02; 95% CI 0.00 - 0.18, respectively). No significant between-intervention differences were observed. Compared with the control group, both intervention groups showed significantly greater handgrip strength at two days after ICU admission and at ICU discharge (P < 0.05). Neither intervention significantly affected ICU or hospital length of stay (P > 0.05).ConclusionsEM and NMES each play a significant role in the reduction of ICU-AW incidence, enhance the handgrip strength of both upper limbs, but do not reduce ICU or hospital length of stay in lung cancer resection patients.
