Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Parallel Interrogation of β-Arrestin2 Recruitment for Ligand Screening on a GPCR-Wide Scale using PRESTO-Tango Assay
Published on: March 10, 2020
Dynamic Pathway Selectivity of TAS2R5 toward or Away from β-Arrestin or G Protein from Biased Agonists
Donghwa Kim1,2, Hannah R Strzelinski1,2, Camille M Longabardi1,2
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida 33602, United States.
Abstract:
Bitter taste receptors (TAS2Rs) are GPCRs functionally expressed in extraoral organs including the lung, heart, brain, and gastrointestinal system and are candidate targets for novel drugs. It is unclear whether TAS2R5 can be stabilized by structurally distinct agonists resulting in pathway selectivity (biasing) to achieve optimal outcomes. We screened TAS2R5 agonists for signaling toward or away from β-arrestin or G protein ([Ca2+]i). Agonists T5-1 (1,10-phenanthroline) and T5-6 (4,7-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline) coupled equally to G protein but showed marked differences in homologous desensitization (∼21% and ∼91%, respectively). This desensitization was due to dissimilar degrees of β-arrestin engagement compared to the reference agonist T5-7: T5-6 evoked up to ∼86% enhancement of β-arrestin1 or β-arrestin2 recruitment, while T5-1 was biased in the opposite direction, up to ∼78% less, compared to T5-7. T5-1 elicited little receptor internalization compared to T5-6 consistent with the β-arrestin findings. For the initial response, T5-1 and T5-6 represent one-pathway differences (decreased or increased β-arrestin) leading to bias in different directions, while G protein signaling was equivalent. However, under desensitizing conditions T5-6 was decoupled from G protein representing two-pathway biasing in opposing directions for T5-6 (increased β-arrestin and decreased G protein), imposing extreme biasing of β-arrestin over G protein. Our finding that agonists can affect β-arrestin biasing in either direction suggests that TAS2R5 is sufficiently pliable for specific signals to be engineered depending on the desired therapeutic outcome. The dynamic nature of the directionally contrasting changes of the two pathways over time accentuated bias and is due to the interaction of the two signals.
More Related Videos
08:21Monitoring GPCR-β-arrestin1/2 Interactions in Real Time Living Systems to Accelerate Drug Discovery
Published on: June 28, 2019
07:41A Kinetic Fluorescence-based Ca2+ Mobilization Assay to Identify G Protein-coupled Receptor Agonists, Antagonists, and Allosteric Modulators
Published on: February 20, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Amplifying Signals via Enzymatic Cascade
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with one...
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
Assembly of Signaling Complexes
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
GPCRs Regulate Adenylyl Cylase Activity
Two...
Activation and Inactivation of G Proteins